VP debate 2024 - Simulcast: CBS News Vice Presidential Debate with Walz, Vance

preview_player
Показать описание
The 90-minute vice presidential debate of 2024 will be held in New York City and moderated by "CBS Evening News" anchor Norah O'Donnell and "Face the Nation" moderator Margaret Brennan.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This was largely a very civil debate. No personal attacks and they actually discussed policies.

taimoorahmed_
Автор

I counted 0 questions actually answered by Walz.

nathanclark
Автор

And lets thank Biden and Harris for letting our strategic oil supply dwindle away and never replacing it.

leonard
Автор

The moderators are breaking the rules they made!

ruthgraychapman
Автор

Walz said mind your own business. Agreed! but he forced me to pay a crap load more in taxes and if i don't i go to jail. Thanks Tim on you're horrible politics and taxing Minnesota into poverty. Why don't yiu mind your own business on how you spend my money.

RobertClafton
Автор

I can explain what Tim can't. He lies

RobertClafton
Автор

Why is it so hard to find the debate, I searched like 10 different links until I got to this uncut version on a such a relatively small channel...

OmriGrin
Автор

What a liar. Minnesota is NOT #1. It's #4.

TerribleSimRacer
Автор

Anybody thinking of voting for Harris should read Kim Weeks posts!!!

jonstaib
Автор

Wow they really muffled him for nearly a whole minute on the very first question. This doesn't look good so far.

StoicOdinSon
Автор

Waltz makes excuses for being a liar! Shameful!

ruthgraychapman
Автор

Why was it cut off when it came to Vance responding to the child care ? @ 1:29:07

analiaastorga
Автор

I went to school with armed guards and I was thankful. They saved my life a time of two.

ruthgraychapman
Автор

VP debate: 'your boss is the problem', 'no! Your boss is the problem'. I think this re-iterates u.s vps are not as close to as powerful as many think, but due to the fact a president may die or xyz, VP matters in-case more than on-cases? VP just have convincing opportunities, which is often behind close doors. Assignments for VP can help or harm a vp, as Biden sacrificed Harris with the border, the hardest to control in faulty world capitalism, or ask Europe... When they blame the top and ignore congress, it reminds us even some members of congress do not vote their conscience when under a bully like Trump? Check the border bill to confirm that.
On economy, the voters who trust donald Trump are simple minded and democrats are very poor in explaining to the lay-folks. Accusing Trump of raising the 'national debt' should be explained. Trump took billions against u.s children and a big fraction of that went to billionaires, the remnants of that is what voters felt... Loans and raising real income are very different. Similarly, is what is going on with African debts and they argue on very far fetched trickle down theory.
On wars, it puzzles me why Democrats are not showing how Trump partly seeded the worst war that is going on?
I think Republicans, especially Trump, will win the Abortion issue, but not now... This is not say some terrible Republicans are any where close to right on abortion. This is one area, where mainstream media is vaguely wrong.

Neither party or candidate has good plan for housing in the u.s, not to mention the world.
Vance over accusing Harris as 'American people empower you' to do everything is wrong. A VP cannot have his or her own policy. You need to convince the president and congress on many things.

On health, pre-Aca was terrible. It is one area where Obama did better than the establishment and Trump was very wrong in trying to go back without a better replacement. Although it can get lot better, democrats are more likely to care about poor folks health than republicans.

Rather than biden-harris, vance is using Harris-Biden ? Contesting election results at court is ok, but not calling for 'wild' protests? Vance is very dangerous in not admitting Trump lost the election. Whereas Obama, Biden-Harris may be guilty of censorship, Trump is worse if you look at Assange+...

Two men facing two women as debate moderators? Debate rules with or without instant fact-check? I think without instant fact check is better in our age, including to avoid bias accusations.

papajigster
Автор

I'm gonna love sending that sound bite. "We need to shake hands and hand over power" when Trump wins.

StoicOdinSon
Автор

Still waiting for JD Vance and the GOP to drop that report on how illegal immigration is the greatest issue when it comes to the cost and availability of housing.

snoodlemysnicker
Автор

Vance really hit the ball out of the park. Very impressed by this debate!

trista
Автор

Still unfair that one candidate is fact checked and not the other.

roybreitkreuz
Автор

It doesn't matter what side you're on... but this debate was SO EPIC! Finally a debate where the ad hominims are kept to a minimum and 100% raw uncut policy debate. I am 34 and can't even remember the last time I saw a debate like this!

dallaslooksmaxxer
Автор

Finished the video. Can everyone here agree that these VPs are WAY better than the Presidential picks? I mean HOLY SHIT that was phenomenal speaking. No BS no name calling, very respectful shit the entire time, clear outlined policies and while i certainly am not voting for kamala harris i would at least in the future possibly vote for Walz after he admitted he miss spoke on accident about the china timeline stuff. That was a solid choice. Americans like forgiving honest mistakes. J.D. Vance was a solid guy the whole time, the Bias was still there in full form but Walz didnt abuse it like Harris did so really proud of that. Ill vote trump due to Elon, B. Epstein cant remember his name, the Weinstein brothers, Joe Rogan, several other billionaires agree with his policies efficacy, and of course the simple fact that EVERYONE loved how generous and incredible trump was until the very second he said he was going to run for president. That SWITCH happened instantly and without any evidence they immediately started abusing the shit out of him for no reason and now 10 years later they have come up with all maner of stretched truths and lies to slander him. Hes definitely going to be an insanely rich man with the volume of character smearing theyve done. Reputation destruction with lies is actually extremely illegal, they call it Defamation and every media outlet on TV is going to be sued for it. Every reporter that knowingly did it will too. A lot of million dollar suits comong from that shit after his second term. no doubt.

StoicOdinSon