Assessing Evolutionary Debunking Arguments (Dr. Tomas Bogardus)

preview_player
Показать описание
In this interview, Dr. Tomas Bogardus joins me to discuss his paper "Only All Naturalists Should Worry About Only One Evolutionary Debunking Argument." The pdf of the paper is linked below. In the paper, he presents three versions of evolutionary debunking arguments (EDA's) against moral knowledge and shows why each fails. He then presents a fourth version of an EDA that is successful, but explains why it should only concern naturalists.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Dr Bogardus interviews are always like a whole introduction to a topic in Philosophy for me.

MatthewThomas-yeei
Автор

Great interview with a great philosopher!

andrewmoon
Автор

Dr. Bogardus also did an interview on Capturing Christianity on whether Christians should be skeptical of their beliefs if they would have believed otherwise had they been born in another culture. That discussion is a natural sequel to this one; however, that discussion was about religious beliefs instead of moral beliefs.

andrewmoon
Автор

Sure, Evolution did only the unimportant parts of the body, whereas the brain is God's masterpiece. That is revealed in the Bible, I just can't find it. Maybe I need a PhD.

goodquestion
Автор

@Crash Course Apologetics, I am subscribed to your channel, and need some help with how to interpret YT's presentation of the time of your conversation with Dr Cyr in UK time. If it had been at 0100 h + date, I get it, or 00.01, I get it, but 00.00 + date does not distinguish 12 mn July 9th from 12 mn July 10th. Please advise. Thanks in advance.

chiaratiara
Автор

Facts and truth and their power of adaptation are limited by context.

Facts and truth are most adaptable at a global context instead of a local context.

ConceptHut
Автор

Love these videos! Although too much ads 😅😩

dco
Автор

Geez, right off the bat, he conflates moral instincts with moral beliefs. 🤦

AtheismActually