Was Mary Really a Virgin? (Mary was a Virgin and Jesus had no Brothers and Sisters!)

preview_player
Показать описание
Was Mary Really a Virgin? Yes, Mary was a Virgin for her whole life and Jesus had no brothers and sisters or siblings. Mary was an ever virgin and this video discusses the so called brothers and sisters of Jesus and myths and misconceptions that people have to this Catholic teaching.

SUPPORT: Please help us to keep growing and saving souls!

FOLLOW CATHOLIC TRUTH:
Instagram: Catholic_Truth_Official

APOLOGETICS TRAININGS:

BOOK: Counterfeit Spirituality: Exposing the False Gods (All about New Age practices, Yoga, Reiki, Astrology, Law of Attraction, etc.)
Also see Barnes & Nobles, etc.

Related Searches: mary was virgin, mary ever virgin catholic, did jesus Christ have other brothers and sisters, catholic

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I finally got my rosary the other day. I was having bad dreams for a month straight and since I have been praying the rosary every morning and night before bed I have not been having bad dreams. God bless. Let’s pray for all of the Protestants out there seeking truth

nathanoppy
Автор

Thank you so much for this post. I just discovered your channel (thanks be to God)and I can't wait to review all your material. God bless you and keep up the great work of defending our Church

bdawnproductions
Автор

Thank you for defending the Church and our Blessed Mother.

marcihf
Автор

Only God could make His Own perfect Immaculate Mother.

gloriaanoveros
Автор

I really love your work and I’m so inspired by your wisdoms. I was a weak catholic ones I was being brain washed by protestants and almost changed religion. I just didn’t have answers but hard work of research and reading the catechism and people like you helped me but I also believe the holy spirt guided me. Thank you so much for your hard work of all the research you’ve done and having courage to have a YouTube channel my god bless you and our holy mother take care of you.

victorg
Автор

Congratulations on 30, 000 subscribers! Keep up the great work!

julieelizabeth
Автор

I’ve known and believed this fact for over 75 years. God said it, I believe it. Enough said.

patriciabrough
Автор

Thanks Brian, this was a very timely video for me. I appreciate your videos very much. God bless from Malta

martinbonniciphotography
Автор

Thank you for shedding this to the light. God bless you

NancyZen-ihhp
Автор

God bless you Brian, for preserving and explaining our Holy faith, which is always under attack.

Endtimescounterchurch
Автор

God help me a sinner, help me to understand who's right and who's wrong, for now a days there are so many false teachers. I put my trust in you God. Amen.

financersyiemlieh
Автор

Before I found the one true church, I believed Jesus had half brothers and sisters. This false teaching is excepted and defended adamantly by Southern Baptists Churches. I have tried to confront my Baptist brothers and sisters about this and I use the Bible and the church fathers and they still say that brothers and sisters of Jesus mentioned in the gospels are from Mary. So many lies that prostantans are being taught and believe in. Thanks be to God that I have found the one true church, the Catholic Church.

chandlercaulder
Автор

Interesting video series, thank you for that.

johns
Автор

Matthew 13:55–56 55 “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son?r Isn’t his mother’ss name Mary, and aren’t his brotherst James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? 56 Aren’t all his sisters with us? Where then did this man get all these things?”

The brothers of Jesus or the adelphoi (Greek: ἀδελφοί, translit. adelphoí, lit. "of the same womb")[1][Notes 1] are named in the New Testament as James, Joses (a form of Joseph), Simon, Jude, [2] and unnamed sisters are mentioned in Mark and Matthew.[3] They may have been: (1) the sons of Mary, the mother of Jesus, and Joseph, (2) sons of Mary the wife of Cleophas and sister of Mary, the mother of Jesus; or (3) sons of Joseph by a former marriage. While option 1 is described as the "most natural inference" from the New Testament, those who uphold the perpetual virginity of Mary reject the idea of biological brethren and maintain that the brothers and sisters were either cousins of Jesus (option 2, the position of the Catholic Church) or children of Joseph from a previous marriage (option 3, the Eastern Orthodox Churches).[4] The Lutheran Churches have accepted both option 2 and option 3 as being valid explanations for the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary.[5]
It did not say Uncles children. So they can not be cousins.
The word used unless modified by another word Of the same womb.
And Joseph was told to take Mary after Jesus was born. So there is absolutely no way that Mary was a virgin all her life!!
God Bless.

kennethprather
Автор

Thank you for your videos! They are very helpful :)

Brenda
Автор

Wow, clear as clear can be. Thank you for your wisdom.

MariaGuerrero-pjtt
Автор

To believe a virgin birth takes faith. To believe a married couple never had congical rights is just gullible.

odonohoe
Автор

It helps a lot Bryan, thank you 😀 It's my new favourite channel! 😀

letstalk
Автор

An important historical document which supports the teaching of Mary’s perpetual virginity is the Protoevangelium of James, which was written probably less than sixty years after the conclusion of Mary’s earthly life, when memories of her life were still vivid in the minds of many.

To begin with, the Protoevangelium records that when Mary’s birth was prophesied, her mother, St. Anne, vowed that she would devote the child to the service of the Lord, as Samuel had been by his mother (1 Sam. 1:11). Mary would thus serve the Lord at the Temple, as women had for centuries (1 Sam. 2:22), and as Anna the prophetess did at the time of Jesus’ birth (Luke 2:36–37). A life of continual, devoted service to the Lord at the Temple meant that Mary would not be able to live the ordinary life of a child-rearing mother. Rather, she was vowed to a life of perpetual virginity.

However, due to considerations of ceremonial cleanliness, it was eventually necessary for Mary, a consecrated “virgin of the Lord, ” to have a guardian or protector who would respect her vow of virginity. Thus, according to the Protoevangelium, Joseph, an elderly widower who already had children, was chosen to be her spouse. (This would also explain why Joseph was apparently dead by the time of Jesus’ adult ministry, since he does not appear during it in the gospels, and since MARY IS ENTRUSTED TO JOHN, rather than to her husband Joseph, at the crucifixion).

According to the Protoevangelium, Joseph was required to regard Mary’s vow of virginity with the utmost respect. The gravity of his responsibility as the guardian of a virgin was indicated by the fact that, when she was discovered to be with child, he had to answer to the Temple authorities, who thought him guilty of defiling a virgin of the Lord. Mary was also accused of having forsaken the Lord by breaking her vow. Keeping this in mind, it is an incredible insult to the Blessed Virgin to say that she broke her vow by bearing children other than her Lord and God, who was conceived through the power of the Holy Spirit.

The perpetual virginity of Mary has always been reconciled with the biblical references to Christ’s brethren through a proper understanding of the meaning of the term “brethren.” The understanding that the brethren of the Lord were Jesus’ step brothers (children of Joseph) rather than half-brothers (children of Mary) was the most common one until the time of Jerome (fourth century). It was Jerome who introduced the possibility that Christ’s brethren were actually his cousins, since in Jewish idiom cousins were also referred to as “brethren.” The Church allows the faithful to hold either view, since both are compatible with the reality of Mary’s perpetual virginity.

Today most Protestants are unaware of these early beliefs regarding Mary’s virginity and the proper interpretation of “the brethren of the Lord.” And yet, the Protestant Reformers themselves—Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli—honored the perpetual virginity of Mary and recognized it as the teaching of the Bible, as have other, more modern Protestants.



SO WHAT DOES THE EARLY CHRISTIANS BELIEVED?

ORIGEN

“The Book [the Protoevangelium] of James [records] that the brethren of Jesus were sons of Joseph by a former wife, whom he married before Mary. Now those who say so wish to preserve the honor of Mary in virginity to the end, so that body of hers which was appointed to minister to the Word . . . might not know intercourse with a man after the Holy Spirit came into her and the power from on high overshadowed her. And I think it in harmony with reason that Jesus was the first fruit among men of the purity which consists in [perpetual] chastity, and Mary was among women. For it were not pious to ascribe to any other than to her the first fruit of virginity” (Commentary on Matthew 2:17 [A.D. 248]).

IGNATIUS Bishop of Antioch, Disciple of the Apostle John
The virginity of Mary, her giving birth, and also the death of the Lord, were hidden from the prince of this world:—three mysteries loudly proclaimed, but wrought in the silence of God. (Letter to the Ephesians circa 107 AD)

ATHANASIUS
“Let those, therefore, who deny that the Son is by nature from the Father and proper to his essence deny also that he took true human flesh from the ever-virgin Mary” (Discourses Against the Arians 2:70 [A.D. 360]).

JEROME
“[Helvidius] produces Tertullian as a witness [to his view] and quotes Victorinus, bishop of Petavium. Of Tertullian, I say no more than that he did not belong to the Church. But as regards Victorinus, I assert what has already been proven from the gospel—that he [Victorinus] spoke of the brethren of the Lord not as being sons of Mary but brethren in the sense I have explained, that is to say, brethren in point of kinship, not by nature. [By discussing such things we] are . . . following the tiny streams of opinion. Might I not array against you the whole series of ancient writers? Ignatius, Polycarp, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, and many other apostolic and eloquent men, who against [the heretics] Ebion, Theodotus of Byzantium, and Valentinus, held these same views and wrote volumes replete with wisdom. If you had ever read what they wrote, you would be a wiser man” (Against Helvidius: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary 19 [A.D. 383]).

“We believe that God was born of a virgin, because we read it. We do not believe that Mary was married after she brought forth her Son, because we do not read it. . . . You [Helvidius] say that Mary did not remain a virgin. As for myself, I claim that Joseph himself was a virgin, through Mary, so that a virgin Son might be born of a virginal wedlock”

HILARY OF POITIERS
“If they [the brethren of the Lord] had been Mary’s sons and not those taken from Joseph’s former marriage, she would never have been given over in the moment of the passion [crucifixion] to the apostle John as his mother, the Lord saying to each, ‘Woman, behold your son, ’ and to John, ‘Behold your mother’ [John 19:26–27), as he bequeathed filial love to a disciple as a consolation to the one desolate” (Commentary on Matthew 1:4 [A.D. 354]).

DIDYMUS THE BLIND
“It helps us to understand the terms ‘first-born’ and ‘only-begotten’ when the Evangelist tells that Mary remained a virgin ‘until she brought forth her first-born son’ [Matt. 1:25]; for neither did Mary, who is to be honored and praised above all others, marry anyone else, nor did she ever become the Mother of anyone else, but even after childbirth she remained always and forever an immaculate virgin” (The Trinity 3:4 [A.D. 386]).

AUGUSTINE
“In being born of a Virgin who chose to remain a Virgin even before she knew who was to be born of her, Christ wanted to approve virginity rather than to impose it. And he wanted virginity to be of free choice even in that woman in whom he took upon himself the form of a slave” (Holy Virginity 4:4 [A.D. 401]).

“It was not the visible sun, but its invisible Creator who consecrated this day for us, when the Virgin Mother, fertile of womb and integral in her virginity, brought him forth, made visible for us, by whom, when he was invisible, she too was created. A Virgin conceiving, a Virgin bearing, a Virgin pregnant, a Virgin bringing forth, a Virgin perpetual. Why do you wonder at this, O man?” (Sermons 186:1 [A.D. 411]).

“Heretics called Antidicomarites are those who contradict the perpetual virginity of Mary and affirm that after Christ was born she was joined as one with her husband” (Heresies 56 [A.D. 428]).



WHAT DOES THE PROTESTANT REFORMERS BELIEVED?

MARTIN LUTHER
“Christ…was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him…’brothers’ really means ‘cousins’ here, for Holy Writ and the Jews always call cousins brothers.” (Sermons on John, chapters 1-4, 1537-39)

ZWINGLI
“To deny that Mary remained ‘inviolata‘ before, during and after the birth of her Son, was to doubt the omnipotence of God…and it was right and profitable to repeat the angelic greeting — ‘Hail Mary’…God esteemed Mary above all creatures, including the saints and angels — it was her purity, innocence and invincible faith that mankind must follow.
‘Fidei expositio, ‘ the last pamphlet from his pen…There is a special insistence upon the perpetual virginity of Mary.”

JOHN CALVIN
“He says that she [Mary of Cleophas] was the sister of the mother of Jesus, and, in saying so, he adopts the phraseology of the Hebrew language, which includes cousins, and other relatives, under the term ‘brothers.’”

soystudios
Автор

Thank you for your wisdom 🙏🏻 and thank you for being a Sovereign Soul of God 🕊
IN JESUS NAME!!!

HONORABLESOUL