Kumburgaz Turkey UFO DEEP DIVE! Can this INFAMOUS UAP Case be Explained or Debunked?

After getting loads of requests I will do a deep dive into the famous Kumburgaz Turkey UFO case today! The unexplained UAP footage was filmed between 2007 and 2009 by a man called Yalcin who was the night security guard at the Yeni Kent Apartments. It was allegedly witnessed by 20 other witnesses including Jaime Maussan, Dr Roger Leir and Antonio Urzi. In this video I propose various theories of what the footage might be showing and highlight big red flags that put the authenticity of the clips into question. I hope you enjoy.

Antonio Urzi video:

Debunking UFO’s All Episodes Playlist:

Debunk Stamp Animation by Discord user Kapital Kog Kirby!

My Jeremy Corbell video:

Is Dr Steven Greer Legit:

Phoenix Lights Debunked:

Is Bob Lazar lying:

#ufo #Debunked #paranormal

0:00 Intro
0:33 Disclaimer and thanks for Metabunk
0:48 What is the Kumburgaz Turkey UFO
1:30 Who filmed the Kumburgaz Turkey UFO
1:40 Where was the Kumburgaz Turkey UFO filmed?
2:08 The Antonio Urzi connection
2:58 The Dr. Roger Leir connection
4:00 You can see the Aliens in the Cockpit
5:35 The Stabilized footage
6:27 Initial red flags
8:51 Red flags
10:33 Theory 1 Explanation
18:43 Theory 2 Explanation
20:34 Theory 3 Explanation
21:58 Theory 4 Explanation
24:33 Outro

Additional tags:

Rods,
Paranormal creature,
Nasa jets,
AARO,
Pentagon Report,
Pentagon UFO Report,
UAP evidence,
Timothy Phillips,
Sean Kirkpatrick,
unidentified anomalous phenomena,
stigma around ufos,
all-domain anomaly resolution office,
limited data,unidentified objects,
aerospace,
uap research,
nasa ufo news,
national security,
alien,uap news,
nasa news,
navy news,
uap meaning,
ufo sighting,
ufo research,
aliens,
usnews,
nasa ufo,
ufo news,
nasa uaps,
aviation safety,
siloed agencies,
faa,
ufo,
aaro,
ufos,
nasa,
uaps,
nasa uap,
uap report,
nasa uap report

Robert Scott Lazar (/ləˈzɑːr/; born January 26, 1959) is an American conspiracy theorist who claims to have been hired in the late 1980s to reverse-engineer extraterrestrial technology at what he described as a secret site called "S-4". Lazar alleges that this subsidiary installation is located several kilometres south of the United States Air Force facility popularly known as Area 51.
Lazar claims he examined an alien craft that ran on an antimatter reactor powered by element 115, which at the time had not yet been synthesized. He also claims to have read US government briefing documents that described alien involvement in human affairs over the past 10,000 years. Lazar's claims resulted in bringing added public attention to Area 51 and fueling conspiracy theories surrounding its classified activities.
Lazar has no evidence to support his core claim of alien technology. His story has been analyzed and rejected by skeptics and some ufologists. Universities from which he claims to hold degrees show no record of him, and supposed former workplaces have disavowed him. In 1990, he was convicted for his involvement in a prostitution ring and again in 2006 for selling illegal chemicals.

[Chuckies_pie]

Most of these explanations aren't working bro, you don't show the video of him zooming in and out, also how can it be the lenses or ring on even a particular lens with the two figures in the gap, none of the examples you give for that have anything similar.

[bingers_tv]

A lot of those explanations don't work, as in the original film you see him zooming all the way back out and back into it, so it is definitely not a close object. You see him zooming out until it looks like a star in the sky

[ukkusu]

Unfortunately I'm not agree with your debunking theories but I am not defending this gentleman's footage either, nevertheless I would like to point out couple things (extra information for all of you);
-While recording the video he is talking (himself and some people around) and explain that the object very slowly moving, not steady (I'm native Turkish speaker)
-He is trying to estimate object's altitude time to time, sometimes right above the water level sometimes high 7k feet (which is around 2km)
-Object is shape shifting (cruise ship forehead! why not)
-Sometimes there are several object(s) glowing, spinning, vanishing, etc.
-Object not in exact same spot all those years (same point of view but different spot different altitude)
I believe this footage one of the best UAP videos, of course it could be also a great hoax too but anyway we are all curious and trying to figure out what is going on really, are we alone or not!
Thank you very much for your awesome work, cheers

[americanninja]

Well, the guy that said he saw him making this video, didn't necessarily had to lie. The question is what did he saw him filming.

[vanhouten]

There is another very effective argument against the Kumburgaz object being a distant object: any distant object viewed through magnification at a low elevation above the horizon should exhibit a distorted, shimmering appearance, due to being seen through a thick layer of atmosphere. Yet the Kumburgaz object appears very steady (aside from the camera motion).

[berk]

8:59 I am native Istanbulian. Do you know where Kumburgaz in Istanbul is? Very very far from the city. There is nothing out there. No one cares to go there.

[matth]

The video was examined thoroughly from what I remember and they deemed it to be impossible to be anything you have stated. Why did you completely ignore the report? Also I’m not buying the good old flying cruise ship theory 😂 as even you state where is the rest of the ship and why is it not lit as required by maritime law? Come to think of it as you also don’t like he filmed this on at least 2 separate occasions ( because that would be weird?! ) why is a completely dark ship in the same location again ?? and as you say why is it stationary? I’m not saying this is little green men but your “debunking” is poor at best. This is far from clearly and concisely explained.

[SWPNL]

He has a cigarette in his hand hence cannot trust him with camera equipment.🤣

[dapencilshinobi]

7:50 …. And now you’re blaming a man from turkey FOR NOT HAVING 4k?

[ShipMonster]

Hypothesis, if you want to bust on people for questionable language please use the correct word. It's not a theory you're coming up with it's a hypothesis.

[jamesgriffin]

He’s smoking a cigarette, so authenticity is in question 😆
ELITE level debunking here folks..

[ZeeZeeCat]

Indeed, what captured my interest was the dog's behavior. One can perform and orchestrate the sightings, but the way he convinced the animal to behave so authentically... That man is a genius. ;-)

[sfischer]

if he filmed it off a monitor like you said, you would see some sort of flicker or even stripes going up and down due to frame rates

[biogopher]

My first question was "what does it look like during the day?" Weird they didnt show normal shot for comparison

[yoggoh]

I am greatful to YT mind reading algorithms that allowed me to find you Sneezing Monkey! I was wondering about what's going on with Ghost Adventurers and your video about this topic popped up. I decided to check your channel and I am amazed by the gem YT proposed to me.

Keep up the good work man! Keep the scepticism alive!

[InTheFieldScottBrowne]

You need to examine the same object that he shot during the day…. The lights are in the same curvature and are hovering during the day.

[terrykirk]

I really dislike when people stage ufo sightings.

[Ozoglutaylan]

I wanted to write this to you from Turkey. As a country, we are strangers to such incidents and this was filmed in 2009. No drones, mobile phones are not advanced, and not everyone has a pro camera. At that time, they used to call anyone who told us about such a subject crazy. I respect that it is treated with suspicion, but it is very, very difficult to forge to such an advanced degree in the year of the shooting and the technological conditions of that period.

[dapencilshinobi]

2:30……why is he judging the man because he’s smoking a cigarette?

[flarkey]

Nice analysis - you used some of my pictures from Metabunk when explaining the CCTV theory! :P