Julius Caesar (1 of 3)

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I think this guy is great. If you really listen to the plays you see how he throws a fascinating insight that both enrich and deepen our understanding of what's going on and in this particular lecture the historical background. Fascinating comparisons between Coriolanus and Julius Caesar which enhance appreciation of both plays. He's much better than some of the high profile contemporary critics on Shakespeare who get far more limelight - and don't make Shakespeare Bloom!

norrinradd
Автор

History is all wrapped up in the plays of Shakespeare, especially, Julius Ceasar and Coriolanus.I have enjoyed this talk.

abooswalehmosafeer
Автор

Love your channel. Thank you for bringing your work to YouTube!

XxFredAstairexX
Автор

What a fascinating person. I believe it was Isaac Asimov who said once mankind ceases to pay attention to Shakespeare the race has no future and might as well go extinct

markhunt
Автор

extremely interesting lecture, thank you very much as always!

itscrystalclear
Автор

Great set of lectures! Just wanted to add that Cicero was not a patrician 45:00

davyroger
Автор

What a stamina and patience for such a never ending lecture.... Gees, it was tough.. I hope the professor hasn't damaged his vocal cords..

bellringer
Автор

Give this Man a nice hot cup of milk mixed with Ginger and Almonds.Please.Thanks.What an Erudition!!

abooswalehmosafeer
Автор

Except the central protagonist of Coriolanus exists from Act ! through to Act 5, while Julius Caesar makes a quick exit. In the latter play, the eponymous character strikes us an historical actor playing in the drama of the politics of the Roman empire, while the former gives us a story about a hero whose tragic flaw, which is sufficient to hold the audience's interest.

jamesduggan
Автор

I doubt that the eros/thumos opposites are apposite as a way to characterize Shakespeare's intent--or as underpinning the murderous schemes of Roman warlords, for that matter. Will clearly plundered Plutarch/Boccacio, Hollinshed, the Greek and Roman myths, etc., for 'ripping yarns, ' not philosophic subtleties. He was just channeling the paranoid thought-pattern of the guys who rose to precarious power, who knew that 'uneasy lies the head that wears a crown, ' and who strove to identify and expunge potential threats from whatever quarter. This is just SOP for those in power, and Greek sophistry isn't necessary to explain it.

malamati
Автор

Does this guy ever actually talk about Shakespeare's aesthetical work?? every time I am left to watch him he goes on and on and on about these boring ancient insignificant vicious political systems!!!

MahmoudIsmail.