The Catholic Church: Masterpiece Of Deception (REBUTTED) - Part 1

In this video Trent examines Josh at Servus Christi's arguments that Catholicism promotes a "false Jesus."

[jamesm]

2000 years later, a young man figured out the right teachings of christian faith. Him alone. Wonderful. I am speechless.

[ghallora]

As a past Protestant I can say deep down it is pride. A learned Protestant sticks to their belief as they claim the Bible is their authority. However, in reality it is them themselves. As a Protestant you can twist scripture however you like to make it conform to your wanted beliefs.

[protheroenigma]

Hi I am going to explain why Catholicism is unbiblical by citing what the Catholic church doesn't believe in because I misunderstand it. Lol

[volusian]

Gotta say, I've never seen a fellow Catholic pay reverence to a statue in as drastic of a way as Josh holds and handles his Bible in this video

[bluestripsnow]

I like how Trent starts off by saying if Josh disagrees they can debate it out. Josh doesn’t want those kind of problems 😂

[onlylove]

God bless u Trent, im a ex-protestant, and I saw the problem with Christianity long ago, so i became an atheist, not so smart, but I thank the Lord everyday for opening my eyes.

Bc when i came back to the faith, i was walking around telling people im a reborn again Christian, without knowing what that really meant 🤦🏻‍♂️ but since i knew the problems with protestantism christianity, i went back to the early apostolic church fathers, & read my way into the RCC.

Even thou I almost became an eastern orthodox, i softened my heart, & just prayed to God for truth.

As i always start a conversation with atheists, i ask them, if Christianity were true would u be a Christian, most of them say "NO", thats when i know to dust off and move on to the next soul.

So i took my own advice, and said to the Lord if Catholicism is true, I'll be a catholic Lord, so I see it as, not that i read myself into the church alone, but by reading and praying to God, having discernment, asking God show me were im wrong, thats what i believe is the only way, a protestant, r orthodox Christians will see the truth of the RCC.


Bc when i talk to orthodoxs, i ask them this question about Catholicism, 9 out 10 they all say no ill never be a Roman Catholic, it hurts me so bad, bc alot of the orthodoxs ik were ex-protestants.

So it all boils down to hatred for the RCC, and that's why people can't see it, bc they choose not to see it, and that's when God will not uncircumcised your heart, he will hand you over to reprobated mind.


God bless u all my brothers and sisters, 💯 I'm coming home to Rome 😇🙏🏼💯🇻🇦

[comicozzy]

Don't go beyond what is written? The whole doctrine of The Trinity is revelation that goes beyond what was written, extrapolated from scripture but the resolution is not defined in scripture.

[kofiadjei-frimpong]

Do the American Protestant Pastors have problem with the understanding of the English language? Because their understanding of the English language is very deficient.

[allopez]

1964 He refers to the vatican II document.
He should remmember who saved Europe from Islam in the medieval times.

[marylarson]

I love how just done Trent looks in these videos

[tpoy]

What Josh is essentially claiming is that there existed a process (by divine design) of relocating apostolic authority and doctrine from the living apostles to their writings - positively excluding any transmission of that same authority to their successors. This process developed until the death of the last apostle at which point no Christian had or needed any other apostolic authority than the apostolic writings.

The problem with this theory is that it does not match what we know about the church in the late first, second, third, and fourth centuries. The evidence from that early period tells a different story about the transmission of divine revelation, a story that much more closely matches the Catholic theory of apostolic succession. The church at that time shows no evidence of behaving as if sola scriptura were true.

Josh’s theory of the total relocation of apostolic authority and doctrine to the apostolic writings alone upon the death of the last apostle is an ad hoc theory designed to justify the 16th century doctrine of sola scriptura. But when we examine the early post-apostolic evidence we discover a community operating very differently than the Christian communities that have historically embraced sola scriptura over the last five-hundred years.

It is self-defeating to try and evade this criticism by claiming that the early post-apostolic church was a corrupt or false form of Christianity over against the Bible, which allegedly teaches sola scriptura, since the very text and canon assumed by that argument comes to us through the allegedly corrupt or false church - and only appears in its present canonical form hundreds of years into the history of that allegedly corrupted or false church that by that time was undeniably Catholic.

In short, if I’m not going to trust the judgement of the church of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th century in matters of apostolic doctrine, then I have no reason to trust its judgment regarding the canon of scripture. And if I reject its judgment regarding the canon of scripture, then there is no canon of scripture.

[eb]

When josh claims the Catholic faith’s foundation is wrong why is he starting at Vatican II to refute it? 😂

[pokezeldamaster]

I think it's very interesting that Protestant Apologist insist that Catholics teach a false Gospel while misrepresenting what Catholics actually teach and then tell you what their interpretation of Scripture is. If they were following what I see Catholic Apologist do and give the strongest possible argument for Protestantism and then refute it, I guarantee most of these well read Protestant Apologist will convert to the true faith. We do know however that this would take a great in-working of grace from the Holy Spirit, since it is only by grace that we are drawn to God and live in him. Many of these Protestant Apologist likely on some level know the truth but continually reject his voice (although this is a presumption on my part).

[TheJbrammo]

excellent Trent..I'm a lifelong Catholic but was " love bombed" by neighbors who were Protestant while growing up.. I appealed to Parish priests who were helpful but you and others have provided in depth analysis of the one true religion...back then, I didn't have many answers but never left the faith and glad I didn't...Amen

[groatswerth]

When I was an Evangelical I tried to prove sola scriptura was the truth by looking in the Bible to find out how it defined “Word of God”. I discovered that the Bible does not define the Word of God as only what was written in scripture.

[patrickgallacher]

When Servus Christi puts massive pauses in his videos like we’re meant to go “woah” I punch a hole in my wall.

[Againstfascist]

Josh adds words to the Bible, than says how the Church is unbiblical.

[deanphilipsaunders]

*It is indeed ironic that the very arguments and assumptions Josh makes undermine his own presuppositions. Trent does an exceptional job at exposing this.*

[MaguiM]

There is something that really troubles me with our pentecostal brothers and sisters.... the pride and that "you dont know anything, let me teach you" me really sad

[mateusartuso]

We need to pray that Trent may become the next debater representative of catholics. As christians, we have William Craig, Frank Turek and John Lennox, but we NEED a Catholic debater which could debate with all the big names on the atheist side.