How to Normalize cDNA Concentrations -- Ask TaqMan® Ep. 15 by Life Technologies

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, Sr. Field Applications Specialist Doug Rains examines why the choice of an appropriate normalizer gene is so critical for the accuracy of final real-time PCR data. In addition to discussing this gene's importance, Doug provides a helpful reference document which explains in detail how researchers can quantitatively validate their choice of a control gene.
Relative gene expression is one of the most common applications that researchers perform on their real-time instruments. So it's never a surprise when I receive a question like the one I got recently from Shan at Pennsylvania State University, who asks the following:, "Since every cDNA is run with both the gene of interest and internal control, do I have to be sure that the concentration of each cDNA is the same? Excellent question. Let's start with a little bit of review.
Whenever we do a gene expression experiment, we need at least two gene-specific assays one for our gene of interest, and one for an internal control gene, also sometimes referred to as a "normalizer," "housekeeping gene," or "endogenous control." Different terms, same idea.
So what does this second gene -- the normalizer -- do for us? Essentially, its number one job is to normalize our final data for differing input amounts of template. Here's what I mean.
Say I'm comparing the expression of my gene of interest in two samples: an untreated and a treated cell line. When I examine the real-time results, I find that my two samples differ by a single Ct. This result suggests that there's a two-fold difference in my target's expression between the two samples. But how do I know that two-field difference is real?
After all, isn't it possible that my untreated and treated cDNAs had different concentrations, and that's the reason we're seeing a one-Ct difference? Definitely a possibility. Precisely why I also have to run a normalizer gene on each sample.
A good normalizer gene is one whose expression is stable across my various sample types, assuming equal starting amounts. Thanks to the data I collect from this second gene assay, I can effectively monitor input amounts of cDNA, even when they differ from sample to sample. Then, at the end of the run, I can use Ct data from the normalizer gene to correct final expression values for differing input amounts of cDNA. I can thereby avoid having to always add equal amounts of template when running my experiments.
But clearly, for the normalizer to do its job correctly, its expression has to be stable across our sample set. If it's not, the data from the normalizer can actually make our final expression values less accurate. So how does one choose a good normalizer?
To find out, I strongly recommend our kind viewers visit the Life Technologies web page, where you can download a copy of the Relative Gene Expression Workflow document. This PDF has an entire section on choosing the most appropriate normalizer, based not on guesswork, but on good, hard empirical data.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

he was the best Ask Taqman, change my mind

niqhtinqale
Автор

I already knew this, but I just want to say the videos in this series are excellent. VERY helpful. Thank you.

Manny-yj
Автор

Nothing like good, hard empirical data.

shimyns
Автор

i am going to use qPCR for differential expression of my gene of interest. i am totally beginner
to strat,

drshinwarishinwari
Автор

what is the difference between the fold and fold change. My colleague say, whatever 2-ddCT value we got in the last step of gene expression study, is a relative change expression which we can't pronounce the fold change, is that true?

cutieaadi
Автор

Hello! Can I analyse the data if the housekeeping genes are in one group higher due to higher concentration of cDNA in that sample? Is normalisation sufficient enough to analyse the data or do I have to start the experiments again?

yasminesmati
Автор

why we normalize the data by using reference gene.? what's the reason?

ameetkumar
Автор

couldn't we normalize the amount of RNA in each sample before running reverse transcriptase (cDNA conversion)? say measure RNA concentrations and get same amount, then convert to cDNA, that way you have the same amount of cDNA in all of your samples?

Hamlet
Автор

where I can find the software for windows 8?

victorcarballo
Автор

..does this mean I dont neccessarily have to use equal amount of cDNA for the samples?

toluolukayode
Автор

which normalizer / housekeeping gene would you recommend for fecal miRNA relative quantitation ?

MrKagningemma
Автор

This whole series was very helpful.  I have a question regarding housekeeper gene expression in a cell. Is it expressed at a constant % of total mRNA in a cell OR is it expressed at a constant quantity in a cell? I realize (thanks to this series), that various things can alter housekeeper expression in a cell, but I still don't know if it's a % or quantity of overall mRNA that is constant in a cell. Please help :)

connordennis