Boeing STOPS manufacturing New Rocket cause of Starliner Failure. Astronauts prefer Dragon...

Boeing STOPS manufacturing New Rocket cause of Starliner Failure. Astronauts prefer Dragon...
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #boeing
===
Boeing STOPS manufacturing New Rocket cause of Starliner Failure. Astronauts prefer Dragon...
“Starliner was a tough call. And I think if Boeing looks back on it, they wouldn't do it again."
To date, this statement of former deputy administrator of Nasa, Lori Garver, about Boeing and Starliner still seems to be correct. Not only cause delays and affect Boeing's reputation, but Starliner also caused Boeing to lose over a billion dollars for many past years.
Boeing STOPS manufacturing New Rocket cause of Starliner Failure. Astronauts prefer Dragon...
Meanwhile, its competitor, Dragon is making crazy strides, helping SpaceX dominate the aerospace industry.
So was Boeing's decision to create Starliner in the past a mistake? Will they still dare to create such a vehicle in the future?
Let's dive into this topic in today's episode of Tech Map.
Boeing STOPS manufacturing New Rocket cause of Starliner Failure. Astronauts prefer Dragon...
Last century, Boeing has always been a formidable name in the field of manufacturing rockets, aircraft, and many other vehicles for the United States. In particular, they also supported Nasa a lot in building the legendary rocket that brought humans to the moon for the first time, Saturn 5, as well as contributing to the development of the Space Shuttle.
===

[Cincy]

I worked as a supplier to Boeing back in the 80's when they were respected. The company's engineers made the company what it is. Once the management decided the "gray beards" were a liability and not an asset, the company was doomed to end up where they are today. You can cite multiple examples of the trend. Stonecipher's disgrace, the corporate move to Chicago, the failure to put Al Mulally in the CEO position and many others to numerous to recite. The house cleaning at the top that just happened was long overdue. The remaining question is will the new team be any different?

[kevinfarley]

Boeing was a fine company in it's time. That time is long past. SpaceX has made that clear.

[doughale]

It seems Boeing is losing it’s way on multiple fronts.

[mercerconsulting]

All companies have access to the same basic resources. The difference, as I've said before, is how these resources are managed. As a certification instructor, I have confidence in my assessment.

[costiqueR]

"3:50 Next flight Crew 8 scheduled in February 2022"... this is an automatic AI generated video, a lot of errors, I see it as clickbait...

[thomasboese]

Boeing was going great until the merger... The management of the failed company was sucked-in and lost its name but after the merger the failed company RAN Boeing into the ground to make the stockholders happy. Fire the bean counters. Pay the going rate for highly skilled engineers.

[earth]

The legacy company doesn't consider anything a delay. They consider it a needed bonus check enhancement. All is well.

[BenjamenMeyer]

Boeing should just give up on Starliner, and let NASA award Sierra Space with the remainder of their contract.

[MJDP]

Boeing was a company of engineers, and now it's a company of bean-counters. 😢

[AntonyTCurtis]

It is more accurate to say that Starliner was not designed to compete against Dragon. Boeing expected there to be no competition and that SpaceX would give up.

[lanceshipman]

Given Boeing’s record with starliner and the profit over safety culture they should shut down development.

[WEPayne]

Viewing this makes twice ye succeeded luring me to watch a TECH MAP vid promising exciting newz. Yet both times were totally wasted in pedagogical litany of old news, irrelevant info and even outright fake newz.

Dislike, block TECH MAP channel.

[SeanHollingsworth]

The only thing Boeing is proficient at nowadays is accounting for all of the money being spent of layers upon layers of stagnant management hierarchies and ever-metastasizing bureaucratic overhead. They can spend $10 billion dollars on a bureaucracy that gets handsomely compensated to spend every penny justifying why they are so handsomely compensated; all while never actually delivering the hardware that they are actually supposed to be delivering. They are very much like a bloated, top-heavy, government entity that cannot be fired.

[WWeronko]

ULA has enough Atlas V vehicles to support the 6 manned contracted missions for Starliner. The Vulcan is not crew rated and someone will have to pay for that certification process. Neither NASA nor ULA seem will or capable of doing so. If Boeing is going to want to fly Starliner more often they'll have to fly on Falcon 9 or wait until Starship gets human rated.

As a backup nasa should have went with crewed Dream Chaser

[juliancrooks]

NASA should demand a full refund from Boeing

[l.ls.]

Boeing has lost its way IMO as a pedestrian user of its services and planes. They start and s top so many projects its no wonder the starliner failed and the nuts and bolts of the company are falling off.

[l.ls.]

Boeing cannot even build a replacement replacement place for the Air Force Tanker refueling platform without numerous issues and delays.

[GregCraft]

can the public have their 4.56 billion dollars back?

[richardhowell]

Either a major redesign via continuous improvement or to be scrapped.