Trump’s Trial - The Truth About The Case

We're still in New York, which is not only the home of our incredible October 7th play, but is the first place to convict a former president with a sham trial. Mark Paoletta joins us to explain the legal double standards and the dubious process behind the persecution and prosecution of Donald J. Trump. Mark is a lawyer who has served in George W. Bush and Donald Trump's administrations, as Chief Counsel of the Office of Management and Budget from 2018 to 2021. He explains to us in layman's terms exactly what Donald Trump was convicted of.

Then, we share the heartwarming story of two friends who reunited at our OCTOBER 7 play. Additionally, we had a very special guest attend our play the other night, surprising the actress who shares her story on stage. We also touch on Melinda Gates’ recent pledge of billions of dollars to expand abortion rights. Lastly, California is leading the fight against parental rights in favor of trans madness and mutilation. Clearly, science doesn't matter in the Golden State. You won’t want to miss it!

𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 - "𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙣𝙣 & 𝙋𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙢 𝙎𝙘𝙤𝙤𝙥"

𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 - 𝘼𝙣𝙣 𝙈𝙘𝙀𝙡𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙮

𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 - 𝙋𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙢 𝙈𝙘𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙚𝙧

[dbmail]

If the American people let this stand, the Republic is lost.

[laurenglass]

Glad to see you discuss the trial of President Trump. You both are all about free speech. The judge gagged only President Trump.

[RobinMorris-uo]

Is it true that there were two corporate lawyers on the jury? Did they have the knowledge that this was a ridiculous case, in view of the fact that they went through law school?

[Staton-itjr]

Nobody is above Alvin Bragg's law!

[lisaletto]

I would love to hear another interview with that lawyer, subject being Pence. There are several controversies surrounding him

[MonaMistric]

It is a business expense if one is paying someone to not speak against you, which would be bad for business.

[Pacdoc-oz]

Ann, I'm a wee bit peeved at your repeated talking over Phelim.
On second thoughts, I extremely annoyed at it because it happens so often it is actually too hard make out what his individual contribution actually consists of and I cite the cc function as being similarly bemused and thrown into such confusion it stops until your next statement comes forth.