After Effects VS Nuke | Which One is Better

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video we'll guide you through two VFX and compositing software: After Effects and Nuke. So you can choose which one is best for you.
--------------------------
00:00 intro
00:13 Industries they are used In
01:16 Compositing tools
02:27 Tracking tools
02:53 Color correction
03:19 Masking tools
03:56 Interface
04:41 Third-Party tools, Plug-ins and scripts
06:01 CPU and GPU usage
06:25 Learning Curve
06:58 Pricing/ Licensing plans
---------------------------
Visit our Website:

InspirationTuts 2D Channel:

InspirationTuts Gamedev Channel:

InspirationTuts CAD Channel:

Help Us Create More Content:

Facebook page:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
***Check out these amazing Blender Addons***

⍟Modeling:
Kit Ops 2 Pro
Hard Ops
Fluent
Box cutter
Mesh Machine
Cablerator
shipwright

⍟Architecture/Rendering
CityBuilder 3D
Sketch Style
E-Cycles
K-cycles
Photographer
Pure-Sky
Physical Starlight And Atmosphere

⍟Vegeration
scatter
Grasswald
Botaniq Tree Addon
Tree Vegetation
Grassblade

⍟VFX, Simulations & Dynamics
Flip fluids
Khaos
Carl's Physics
RBDLab Addon
Spyderfy

⍟Materials/Texturing
Decalmachine
Extreme Pbr
Fluent : Materializer
Bpainter
Material Library Materialiq

⍟ Cloth Simulation:
Simply Cloth

⍟UV unwrapping
Zen Uv
Uv Toolkit
Uvpackmaster

⍟Rigging&Animation:
Human Generator
Auto-Rig Pro
Faceit
Animax
voxel heat diffuse skinning
Animation Layers

⍟Sculpting
Sculpt+Paint Wheel

⍟Retopology
Retopoflow

⍟Ready Vehicles
Car Transportation
Traffiq

⍟Scripting

-----------------------------------------------------------------
***Check out these amazing Courses***

A-Z Environment Design using Trim Sheets:
SciFi Weapon Design in Blender - REMASTERED:
SciFi Mech Design in Blender:
The ULTIMATE Guide to Hard Ops and Boxcutter:

Disclaimer: Some links here are affiliate links that help us create more content. Thanks in advance for using our links
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Nuke = VFX
AE = Motion graphics
Fusion = Both.

rano
Автор

Köszönöm a munkád, nagyon hasznos volt!!! :D

imoteep
Автор

We all have a personal choice but really it's the client work we come into contact with, knowing both+ is the road we have to walk.. Because we stay busy working with the larger skill set. That's the true answer.. do what they need, use what we feel is the best tool to achieve that. good video dude!

griptopia
Автор

I hope this channel never ends and keep spreading happiness ❤️

EcoGeniousX
Автор

I used After effect for several years
and after a brief foray with Natron
( a free Nuke knock off), I moved to Davinci fusion.

Trust me ...once you get over 6 or 7 layers, and have to start precomping, Adobe After effects becomes a compositing nightmare because it is still, at its core, a linear workflow
.
Unlike Nuke, Natron or fusion which are completely node based allowing you to jump to any point in the node tree history and change, remove or add an effect in a nonlinear fashion.

AutodidactAnimotions
Автор

After effects adobe team needs to STOP everything they’re working on and focus on speed and performance, period. They leave us no choice but to switch to other programs, I wouldn’t dare to do a compositing project on AE anymore, clients don’t care about excuses.

doddeddo-
Автор

please make a video on nuke vs fusion studio. please sir

fakehack
Автор

Sir I want to add 3d objects to my video and I want to do 3d compositing. Which is better, after effects or blender

supergreat
Автор

After Effects is the best choice for media and 2D animations
Nuke is so powerful tool for compositing.
they are different in core and aspect, they can NOT be put to comparison .

mightd
Автор

That’s like comparing an ARRI Alexa vs an Iphone lol

BoRisMc
Автор

Timestamps:-

[0:00] Intro
[0:13] Industries they are used In
[1:16] Compositing tools
[1:44] Comparing the compositing tools
[2:27] Tracking tools
[2:52] Color correction
[3:18] Masking tools
[3:56] Interface
[4:41] Third-Party tools, Plug-ins and scripts
[6:01] CPU and GPU usage
[6:25] Learning Curve
[6:58] Price
[7:39] Overall thoughts
[8:04] Outro

samsak
Автор

I don't think you can compare these two tools.
Nuke is much more efficiant in things like 3D Tracking, working with AOVs, Shuffle Channels. I even don't know if it is possible in AE or Fusion.
But I would never start with motiongraphics in Nuke, so I think AE is the better tool for Motiongraphics. But for a efficiant workflow with Colorspaces/managments, Nuke will always be the choice. But to compare these tools in price, I would recommend to learn fusion for every videographer out there.

HTCBadrecon
Автор

Can you please recommend some channels or lessons to learn Nuke?

LoveChristJesus
Автор

If i want to get a job as a vfx artist i need to switch from after effects to nuke?

video_pro
Автор

a person with a good visual knoledge, software dosenot matter.

edma
Автор

Show me something one cant do that the other can for free and youll have a winner. Movies and vfx have been done for years without Nuke or Ae so to those saying one comps better is bs how many nodes or layers does one need for an explosion lets be real your really just doing one effect at a time, anything else is hate or fanboyism

ilikeithardcoretv
Автор

i feel like he didnt make this clear enough, but, Nuke is used in just about every tv show and movie made in recent years. After Effects is practically NEVER used as a COMPOSITING tool in movies or tv shows at all.

natemosemann
Автор

nuke is film comoisiting one tool it is katana, aftereffect is swiss multitool all rounder, fusion is terrible hybrid -Zeratul-

mangwonfish
Автор

Fusion is the future. 10-20 years from now it will be the world standard.

MilitaryEternal
Автор

AE With bunch of cool 3rd party NUKE, Fusion and 69 others

editorshakir