TOP 10 MOST DANGEROUS CARS IN 2022 | The Worst Cars for safety

preview_player
Показать описание
Are you in the market for a new car? Well, you might want to avoid these 10 models – they're the most dangerous cars on the road in 2022!

Here is the list:

-Hyundai Accent
-Ford Fiesta
-Renault Zoe
-Fiat Panda
-Fiat Punto
-Nissan Navara
-Kia Rio
-Rover 100
-Dacia Spring
-Jeep Wrangler

#cars #trendmax

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
About Us:

Trend Max is an education and entertainment channel dedicated to creating interesting Tops, Lists and more. Do not miss a single video SUBSCRIBE NOW.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

What cars from 1997 are doing on a video supoused to talck about 2022 cars ?? 🤷🏻‍♂️

brunobray
Автор

The Fiat Panda shows clearly the change in the way NCAP scores cars. Back in the day, the car showed good structural integrity and achieved a "good" 4 star score.These days if a manufacturer omits some new feature not yet present on 90% of cars on the road that NCAP deems desirable, they zero the score giving us no way of judging attributes we may prefer to know about, such as structural rigidity. NCAP is no longer as useful a tool if it gives a zero score to cars that may well be safer than 90% of the cars on the road.

rhiantaylor
Автор

First of all, the Fiesta that got only 3 stars was the mark 4/5, a design which dated back to the late 80s, both a heavily facelifted mark 3. The mark 6 scored 4 stars and the mark 7 and 8 both got 5 stars. The mark 1 punto got 2 stars, the ncap results are for the mark 3, the original results for the mark 3 was a 5 star results. The Rover 100 was a design that dated back to the 70s with the Austin Metro, the body structure remained the same until it's demise until 1997. It got a facelift in 1990 with a new engine, it gained safety gear with side impact door beams and an optional drivers airbag in 1995. The Rover is proof how safety has improved over time. I think you need to do your research much better.

jennydonne
Автор

If you can't drive in a straight line without a lane departure warning system you really shouldn't be driving any car.

kurtmuller
Автор

It's sad that a car that can't pretty much drive itself (lane keep assist, automatic braking) is now considered 'unsafe'.

danmccarthy
Автор

Complaining that certain cars don't have lane departure warning, pedestrian alert etc. Is nothing but an admission of being a poor driver. we have been driving for 100 years without relying on all this nonsense! Here's an idea, when people drive how about they concentrate on the roads around them!

notpoliticallycorrect
Автор

This video is what happens when you don't teach students in university properly when reading statistics and using them correctly to support your argument

Notinserviceij
Автор

This really is the biggest load of unmitigated tripe. The Rover 200 was a revamp of the Mini Metro, so it dated back to 1980. I haven't seen one on the road for at least ten years, so the likelihood of anyone buying such a car today except as a museum piece is NIL. Also, much of the NCAP criteria are really bollocks. Having covered the essential stuff like impact protection, they now can't find anything much to pick holes in with most modern cars. The fact that a car doesn't have automatic braking or lane-departure technology (which can itself be dangerously distracting), a warning light to tell you to fasten your seatbelt or some other whizzo gadget doesn't make it significantly more dangerous than anything else. Frankly, if you can't drive without all these gadgets you shouldn't be let loose in a car at all.

davidjones
Автор

Most of those new safety requirements are aimed at drivers not concentrated on driving. At the same time car makers install huge tablet in front of them. Insane logic.

karoltakisobie
Автор

A car with zero stars is still safe. NCAP counts electronic assistant systems, which don't make the car come better out of a crash.

doordedeur
Автор

How humanity managed to avoid complete and utter extinction without the features of automatic braking, lane assist, and a myriad of other expensive "safety" features over the past one hundred years is an absolute miracle!

meatpopsicle
Автор

This is another fantastic example of how to spread fake news. The Rover originated of 1981 as the Austin Mini Metro, which at the time fulfilled al what was needed and was on par with its competitors Fiat 127, Renault 5 Le Car, better than VW Beetle, Renault 4 and 6 or Citroen 2 CV, or the Mini, which it was intended to replace. The original Mini survived it till 2000, despite the fact the car had been reworked as the Metro first than a second time as Rover Metro/100 Series. After the crash test with an that already 17 years in production car, that originated in the mid 70ies. Rover immediately stopped the lines and cancelled all orders which at this time were still strong. The car was abandoned within hours from production and sales. The Fiat Punto is a good car which just failed because of lack of all the new technical safety things which are now requested from the government. But again the Punto dates many years back and has been reworked again and again. This is not the precise information needed to not mislead people. Research could have been much better and more precise. Same goes for Fiat Panda and Renault ZOE

johnrossewingiii
Автор

Your description says "are you in the market for a new car". The Rover 100 ceased production in 1998 and there are less than 600 left. So how do you justify its inclusion.

johnharper
Автор

Some of these cars are not 2022. One isn't even from this century ffs.

Kiinell
Автор

I was recently CLOBBERED by Subaru SUV in my 2014 Fiesta !! It hit me in the drivers side going 50 mph !! The car protected me beautifully, I walked away with just some neck pain. Total Bullcrap !!

ltdford
Автор

The latest Ford Fiesta got 5 stars at the Euro NCAP so a first place for most dangerous carsis ridiculous.

jordydesmedt
Автор

An experienced driver and attentive driver don't need lane assist. I had to drive a 2022 that has it through a ice storm with 80mph winds, it sucked

ubarukenchi
Автор

its kinda meh when a car goes from a good score to a low score just because tests nowadays demand automatic breaking and lane keep. loads of people pretty much always disable lane keeping assist before driving off since this type of systems often don't work great.

yvs
Автор

My company has a 2017 Ford Fiesta with 300, 000 miles.
Chassis has no squeaks or rattles.
Engine easily runs highway speeds and will cruise above that.
The 2017 Fiesta is a an excellent vehicle.

torque
Автор

You mixed the Punto with the Grande Punto and viceversa. The Grande Punto (Called Punto and Punto Evo after 2012 I think) is the one that started the 0 star list, and back when it was new (2007), it had recived not the punto's 2 stars, but 5 full stars. It was considered very safe. And btw. Nothing on it's safety changed apart from airbags (the GP didn't come with side airbags as stock, they were optional, the new Punto and the Punto evo did). The car is still incredebly strong in a crash. But of course, it doesn't drive itself, so it aint safe. That car is as safe as the person driving it. Good driver? Nice, no need to test the 5 stars from 2007. Bad driver...? Well... pitty he won't die...

sedixmrboss