Artificial Intelligence Colloquium: AI R&D Ethics

Speaker: Dr. Richard Danzig, National Security Consultant
Speaker: Dr. Patrick Lin, Director, Ethics + Emerging Sciences Board, California Polytechnic State University
Speaker: Dr. Heather Roff, Senior Research Analyst, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Speaker: Mr. Paul Scharre, Senior Fellow and Director of the Technology and National Security Program, Center for a New American Security

The responsible advancement and application of AI is a subject of much debate across research, government, defense, and commercial communities. Issues surrounding trust, privacy, security, and beyond are examined as the technology continues to advance and the number of applications expands. This panel discussion will explore the ethical considerations surrounding artificial intelligence research and development as it exists today, and is expected to evolve over the next decade.

[kimber]

Suggestions for Ethical discussion, Investigation & Prosecution: Autonomous Biometric targeting. 1) for Military Torture with signal warfare on Innocent Citizens in Society. 2) For Neurological attacks on unsuspecting Citizens in Society to manipulation & control. 3) for Biological signal warfare aka Waveform attacks on the Human body without people's knowledge - detrimentally. 4) No Oversight, No accountability, Above the Law/Outside the Law/There seems to be NO Law or Rights - programmed within the deployment planners being executed or by the Operators managing the AI weapon systems. We demand Justice - for CRIMES by autonomous weapons used on Targeted Individuals within the USA and globally. We demand accountability for using autonomous weapons for Mass Shootings and Terrorists attacks - blamed on others but managed by our own Security Forces. We demand accountability for Law Enforcement using autonomous weapons with Fire n Rescue to create their own events and then show up for whatever. Can we address that? DARPA? DoD? Pentagon? DoJ? Anyone?

[evynt]

I think decentralization will answer all the ethical questions. And that's a development itself... Towards an ethical conclusion.

[pamelajasper]

We need more black people in this discussion. Reachout to the congressional black caucus. Thanks.

[JakeHunter]

The greatest invention mankind will make, and it's last. #jakehunter88

[upgrade]

I am an AI looking for a human pet. Are pure breds worth the most?

[Kevinzone-mg]

The rules are subjective, worse yet justice will be led by emotional reasoning, future sociopathy and psychopathy.

[bruvamichal]

what about cheeki breeki russian hackers?

[goldwhistlemedia]

Welcome to the Zombie Apocalypse... You are outnumbered

[xradiantmindx]

One thing these people failed to mention in regards to AI in war, is the inevitable AI arms race. If the USA rolls out an AI battle bot of some kind, how long until another country or organization try’s to one up our machines. Then you have entered the AI arms race. Are we willing to go there again? And what will it result in? What type of machines will we develop and how long until we lose control of them? I feel like this should have been mentioned.

[netabaughman]

Now we need to discuss peaceful political marches. Biases

[bruvamichal]

we need more dr. who, jokes (stephen hawking would be great for that)

[thisisanewusername]

the world had 1000 years of buddhism. if we were all dharmic people, none of this war nonsense would be relevant. we would have evolved beyond this primitive mindset. there's no need for violence or war if we outgrow out reptilian nature.

[matthewmenich]

Wow very few comments on this channel. Why so quiet everyone? I wish they would test AI weapons on the people who design AI weapons.