Integral e^x cos x two ways

preview_player
Показать описание
In this awesome integral video, I calculate the integral of e^x cos x in two ways, one using integration by parts, and the other using complex numbers. Which method do you like more? Watch this video and find out! Enjoy :)

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I really hate integrals e^(ax)cos(bx) and e^(ax)sin(bx) (in russian we call these "cyclic integrals") because I know there is a general formula for these two but it's pretty complicated, and every time I face them I can never remember it, so I have to go through 2 boring integrations by parts yet again. This "OMG" method can really speed me up, thanks

qubix
Автор

Euler's identity for our integral! How cool is that!
I've seen the latter method several times already but it is still so impessive nontheless.

SlingerDomb
Автор

He made the integral easier through complexification! The first time I read such a sentence, I thought the textbook I was reading made an error but no, complexification apparently makes things easier lol. 😂

emman
Автор

Me watching this video
**Oh my god he speaks in English!!!*

calvinkywong
Автор

Nice! I watched for the second method and it was definitely worth it.

Green_Eclipse
Автор

You're love for math is so contagious :)

LS-Moto
Автор

That second method was amazing! Two for the price of one!

robsbackyardastrophotograp
Автор

I can’t wait for my AP Calc AB class to get to integrals in 1 week! I’ll already know like 90% of the stuff you need to know!

JJCUBER
Автор

I like how he just assumes that I am impressed while I am actually like "Whoaaaa..."

shambosaha
Автор

Roses are red,
π should sound like pee,
you're not the first one
to forget the +C.

musik
Автор

Is it possible to integrate this by taking the integral of the product of the Taylor-maclaurin series of e^x and cos(x) respectively

immutabledestiny
Автор

Hi Dr Peyam, are there some non-standard unusual ways to do this integral?

danielmilyutin
Автор

Oh no, the evil attack of constants :0

mariopina
Автор

Yes but on my calculus for IT class we had only single variable calculus with real numbers (we had a little bit of complex numbers on algebra)
so only by parts method would be accepted

holyshit
Автор

Hello, dear Dr. Peyam! Could you please record a video on Riemann's zeta-function, something like an introduction to the theme, main aspects, an abstract? Thanks in advance.

bavrined
Автор

love when you use the word "junk" -- Doctor of Math calling it "junk" : )

alwysrite
Автор

What would the derivative for y(x) = sin(x) be if you took the infinitieth derivative?

Peter_
Автор

You forgot the +C :o for the integration by parts method ! Still a great video (my favorite way is definitely the complexification of the integral :D) ^^ !

juauke
Автор

Thank you for inspiring me and showing me new ways, Dr. Peyam :) however I am now turning off notifications from your channel because I think my life can be somewhat better by reducing the time I spend watching youtube and instead focusing on educational material. I hope it goes well. Sorry for that, but I think that I just have to do that now. Your content is great and has quite inspired me in situations I wouldn't like; for example, in your f(f(f(x)))=f(x) video I would just call myself braindead and leave the question. You got to the quirkiest of topics. Thank you for all this. ❤

Also I have a question: prove or disprove that all circles have the same number of points.

HawluchaMCPE
Автор

Ah, ok, so

int e^x cos(x) dx =
int e^x Re(e^ix) dx =
Re(int e^((1+i)x) dx) =
Re((e^(1+i)x)/(1+i)) =
0.5 Re(e^x * e^ix - ie^x * e^ix) =
0.5 e^x Re(e^ix - ie^ix) =
0.5 e^x (cos(x) + sin(x))
👏

EpicMathTime