A-Level Psychology (AQA) - Eyewitness Testimony and Misleading Information

Covers the effect of misleading information on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.
Includes leading questions and post event discussion; research by Loftus & Palmer and Gabbert et al.; and explanations for why these impact our memories.

Finishes off with some exam tips and 4 evaluation points.

Ideal for first time learning and revision.

[honeypeaches]

Thank you for properly explaining everything! This has been a life saver for my a levels, so many videos just have the teacher reading out the information on the slide and it doesn't help at all.

[malakfakhroo]

Thank you so much, this has been extremely helpful. I mainly look at the textbooks I'm studying from & occasionally look at videos to further my knowledge. Been through several different accounts (which are good) however I've found myself coming back to your videos as I found them the most helpful!!

[livi]

I'm doing a group project about the effects of post-event discussion and this is very helpful, thank you!

[fionapowleychangecoach]

I am loving these lessons! As a mature student studying remotely, with an online text and the Hodder Education AQA textbook and NO lectures or classes, these are SOOO VALUABLE. Is it possible to add all the memory lessons to the Memory playlist - there are 9 lessons, but only 4 in the playlist and hard to navigate to them unless they pop up as a youtube suggestion. Many thanks!

[exulqnsischerry]

so can you loftus and palmer and gabbert as a01 or a03 if it’s a 16 marker on misleading information

[carrotsticks]

How do I relate post-event discussions to Loftus and Palmers study? I just felt like it focused mainly on leading questions. Thank you so much for these videos :)

[MB-vuxm]

Your lessons are really helpful, thank you but what happened to lessons 4, 5 and 6 for memory there is no explanations of forgetting .

[sophia]

isn’t research support part of the evaluation? If i were to evaluate effects on accuracy of EWT i would write it has research support, writing two paragraphs about Loftus and Palmer and Gabbert and then have a following paragraph that discusses the issue of both studies in regards to their lack of representation of real world experience. Would this do?