Can AI discover new laws of physics? | Max Tegmark and Lex Fridman

preview_player
Показать описание
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:

GUEST BIO:
Max Tegmark is a physicist and AI researcher at MIT.

PODCAST INFO:

CONNECT:
- Subscribe to this YouTube channel
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"anyone with a computer can type pip install feynman" - got me excited there then I went to the site and its for mac and linux only, you bastard!

falcodarkzz
Автор

Max RULES!!! Love that guy! I want to see him chat with Roger Penrose!

chuckaudio
Автор

Lex uses a term in this clip, "dissecting the neural network." What a fascinating and evocative phrase.

liminal
Автор

Anton chigurh(from country for old men) + Clint Eastwood
tell me I'm wrong

aidanhammer
Автор

“We go around with our neural networks..”

manjorbas
Автор

A better project came out recently by making an AI not to start from our known physics but to guess its own way out to describe the physical world phenomena following its own thinking.
Thisbis brilliant as our physics doesn't have to be the only neither the perfect way to describe the universe, is just the way we came out with.
So here we'll be gaining a new interpretation we could have never came up with, but also an exponentially much faster way to progress in physics and mathematics by letting AI drive our reseaches

omar
Автор

You should see my dog catch tennis balls. Fast ball back at ya! I'll stop now.

just-in-spacetime
Автор

Could an AI win a Nobel in physics someday?

baljeetbhachu
Автор

Wait what?? GalilEo would catch it!!!?? Not hit him in the face?

matthewnicholson
Автор

I solved Riemann's Hypothesis using an AI designed by me. (Not a joke).

Автор

Are you kidding 🤣
An GTP LLM which only excute
Pre- Training & Generatin
has Ability to 「Create Law of
Physics」?! 🤔
Please tell me How ChatGPT do it ❤

chenwilliam
Автор

input points

ai:
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}={\bar {\psi }}(i\gamma ^{\mu }D_{\mu }-m)\psi -{\frac {1}{4}}F_{\mu \nu }F^{\mu \nu }, }

GabrielPohl
Автор

Easy answer to the title: yes. Any sufficiently advanced system will be able to do so. Thinking humans or organics would only be capable is just looking in the mirror and flattering yourself. In fact, I would bet money machines would ultimately be better at it depending in how.... Predisposed they are too existing "laws" the way humans are biased. Remember, most of us begin by tearing down or ridiculing things that overturn our existing understanding or beliefs. You see that trend in humans EVERYWHERE from religion to science even in trying to teach equality and acceptance when trying to correct race or class systems to allow all to flourish. Even when these are just arbitrary constructs created by other humans (usually rich or powerful folks) for shit reasons

oneman
Автор

We don't want this type of society

dilipdas
Автор

AI network that can solve problems not knowing really how ? That seems like a hunch.

Lesminster
Автор

Reality has to first believe it exist as reality to infinitely exist and to first believe in reality then reality has to infinitely exist because to first believe in reality then reality has to infinitely exist and reality has to first believe it exist as reality to infinitely exist. Real eternal recurrence as first belief of real existence and first belief of real existence as real eternal recurrence, neutrality as inverse and inverse as neutrality.

theuniques
Автор

Can a. I discovered something new?
Anwser no
Can a. I calcue problem yes

whiteeye
Автор

Is it just me or Max’s speech is annoying af. He stops all of sudden and then continues. It’s unnerving

ufcprophet