Lorentz transformations dont reduce to Galilean transformations at low speeds

The moving goalposts approach by the physics mainstream has led them to making false claims about such mathematics as the Lorentz transformations.

[atheistaetherist]

Steve Crothers & Engelhardt years ago mentioned that Einstein needed a preferred observer at x=0.

[frun]

I, really, don't quite understand why v*x/c^2 doesn't tend to 0, as v -> 0. I know, that coordinates can be arbitrarily chosen, such that x is significantly large, though. Is it, that Lorentz transformations can be reduced to Galilean for some set of coordinates, but not for another?

[HeritageWealthPlanning]

Do you have a theory as to why they forced Einstein on the world?

I mean Einstein was a German Jew and to have Eddington et al tout him from England is incredibly odd

[jamesrarathoon]

I've read that paper as well, I haven't seen any papers to show that results aren't correct; however I don't have a route through the paywall I can afford, so that doesn't say much. I don't believe the Lorentz transformations are correct and am developing my own theory. This is not a easy task, not because the mathematics is hard, but because the critical literature is not easy to access, and because of all the moving of goal posts (as you say) since Dingle's critiques.