filmov
tv
Are you an INFP or INFJ...
Показать описание
INFJ vs INFP personality differences - the INFJ personality and INFP personality have no cognitive functions in common. Of the 16 personalities, these two mbti types are considered some of the most emotionally deep. If you're unsure of the differences INFJ vs INFP, keep watching ✌️
COACHING/PERSONALITY VERIFICATION
0:00 Intro
1:18 Contrasting N function behaviors (Ni vs Ne)
3:54 Contrasting F function behaviors (Fi vs Fe)
9:01 Contrasting S function behaviors (Se vs Si)
11:22 Te & final contrasts
Edit from 2 years after this video was posted for Ti users ;)
Any time I say a behavioral example of how a type shows up like "I tend to notice a lot of ISTJs with fitbits" this is to ground the theoretical concept for viewers who have repeatedly asked me to give behavioral examples and to make content less abstract and confusing. However, any time I stray from motives and transfer to behavior, it will lose universal application. Any time I give an example like this it is not an absolute, it is not a rule, that behavior is not exclusive to that type, that behavior is not the exclusive manifestation of a type's motives, not everyone or even most of the type might do that thing; but it is simply a one-time example of how the motivations that ISTJs share could manifest - not how they must manifest.
In addition, different motivations aside from Si-Te motivations could also prompt someone to get a fitbit, so this behavior alone cannot be used to type someone. In my day to day life, I do not see people with a fitbit and therefore declare them an ISTJ. Any example I give did not come from inductive reasoning which gets applied universally like "I saw 3 ISTJs who wear fitbits therefore all ISTJs have fitbits." In addition these examples can be backed up deductively with Carl Jung's and Van Der Hoop's writing like "Si is finely attuned to sense organs"; "Te likes outcomes and metrics" "therefore an example could be, but is not limited to, ISTJs wearing fitbits, especially when used to measure sense organs."
I have been working on Ti and thus curbing misunderstandings on this front, but in case I say something contrary to this belief, it was due to sloppy Te langauge (or it was a non-serious joke) and not because I believe differently. This series in particular has a lot of sloppy language so this message is getting copy and pasted to all these videos lol.
WATCH NEXT:
SAY HI ON SOCIAL:
Camera: Canon m50
Editing software: Final Cut Pro x
Mic: Rode Video Micro
#infp #infj #16personalities #myersbriggs
COACHING/PERSONALITY VERIFICATION
0:00 Intro
1:18 Contrasting N function behaviors (Ni vs Ne)
3:54 Contrasting F function behaviors (Fi vs Fe)
9:01 Contrasting S function behaviors (Se vs Si)
11:22 Te & final contrasts
Edit from 2 years after this video was posted for Ti users ;)
Any time I say a behavioral example of how a type shows up like "I tend to notice a lot of ISTJs with fitbits" this is to ground the theoretical concept for viewers who have repeatedly asked me to give behavioral examples and to make content less abstract and confusing. However, any time I stray from motives and transfer to behavior, it will lose universal application. Any time I give an example like this it is not an absolute, it is not a rule, that behavior is not exclusive to that type, that behavior is not the exclusive manifestation of a type's motives, not everyone or even most of the type might do that thing; but it is simply a one-time example of how the motivations that ISTJs share could manifest - not how they must manifest.
In addition, different motivations aside from Si-Te motivations could also prompt someone to get a fitbit, so this behavior alone cannot be used to type someone. In my day to day life, I do not see people with a fitbit and therefore declare them an ISTJ. Any example I give did not come from inductive reasoning which gets applied universally like "I saw 3 ISTJs who wear fitbits therefore all ISTJs have fitbits." In addition these examples can be backed up deductively with Carl Jung's and Van Der Hoop's writing like "Si is finely attuned to sense organs"; "Te likes outcomes and metrics" "therefore an example could be, but is not limited to, ISTJs wearing fitbits, especially when used to measure sense organs."
I have been working on Ti and thus curbing misunderstandings on this front, but in case I say something contrary to this belief, it was due to sloppy Te langauge (or it was a non-serious joke) and not because I believe differently. This series in particular has a lot of sloppy language so this message is getting copy and pasted to all these videos lol.
WATCH NEXT:
SAY HI ON SOCIAL:
Camera: Canon m50
Editing software: Final Cut Pro x
Mic: Rode Video Micro
#infp #infj #16personalities #myersbriggs
Комментарии