U.S. Shows Military Power in Pacific

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, we delve into the 75-year-old Taiwan Strait dispute—a classic tale of a small but determined underdog standing firm against a powerful giant. Taiwan's significance on the global stage has soared, driven by China's rapid rise and Taiwan's dominance in the semiconductor industry. As Chinese leader Xi Jinping vows to bring Taiwan under Beijing's control by 2049, tensions have escalated, leading to increased U.S. military support in the region. Discover how America's bold moves, like deploying F-22 Raptors to strategic bases near China, could alter the balance of power in this high-stakes geopolitical struggle.

#militarystrategy #militarydevelopments #militaryanalysis
#themilitaryshow

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

China should not delude itself, Russia did and now its paying a heavy price. "The juice is not worth the squeeze "

kevins
Автор

Kadena Air Base is not on mainland Japan where you've shown it, but instead on the island of Okinawa about halfway to Taiwan and much closer to China.

bryancarter
Автор

F22...designed in the 70's, built in the 80's. And STILL no other country can even come close. The F35 is decades ahead of the competition. Now the B21 is in production. The rest of the world is still making 4th gen while we are already working on 6th gen. There is zero competition in military aircraft design.

goatman
Автор

We haven't seen this since WWII when the combined powers of the US, UK, Australia, India, the Philippines, and China. The Japanese don't stand a chance. And now with the combined force with the US, UK, Australia, India, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, South Korea, Indonesia, Japan and Malaysia along with Canada. The Chinese and the North Koreans don't stand a chance.

marcoeugenio
Автор

Nice Video, I watched it all and it was very informative!

akamebanane
Автор

The J20 is not a comparable fighter to a F35 or F22. Just because you copy technology, it’s not near as capable.

RogueCylon
Автор

With a combined force of the United States, Japan and South Korea, China would not have a chance.

mykllkaloian
Автор

You also have to put into prospective that the F-35 and F-22 can target lock on and take out multiple targets at once

chriskoivisto
Автор

I wonder what would piss off China more if Taiwan excepted the American flag or the Japanese flag

springfield
Автор

F35 *exists*

This guy : Imma pretend i never saw that

JoshyBoi
Автор

I would think the f-35 would do fine against the J-20, and we have more F-35 then they have J-20 and we have the Aims 260 and also a advanced missile Mako

kevf
Автор

Love the videos, so happy I found your channel. Thank you for your hard work

zackruttan
Автор

Graph at 5:35 shows the incorrect position of Kadena Air Base.

Hydro
Автор

Japan is considered an important ally of the United States, even though its constitution denies it the right to engage in war. This is because in the event of a Far East emergency involving the United States, Japan's territorial land, territorial waters, and territorial airspace would become the main battlefield, reducing the risk of an attack on the U.S. mainland.

_unknown_channel_
Автор

J-20's payload is nowhere near the 12 000 tonnes in its internal bays exclusively.. If J-20 carried ordinance in it's non stealthy configuration with missiles slung underneath its wings and fuselage, than yes. But the Raptor can also carry weapons on its wings and then it has a much greater payload than 1, 9 tonnes mentioned here.. The figures were taken for J-20 in its non stealthy configuration while the figures for the Raptor were from it's stealthy mode with internal payload only..

markbrisec
Автор

I wish you guys could edit the analysis in "envelops of operations". You present the abilities of both sides in back and forth format, A could do that, but than B could do that, and if they do A could do that...
For example, you present the Dragon as partially stealthy, but than proceeds to tell us it can have a heavy payload of missiles without saying by doing so they will not be any bit stealthy, regardless or geometry.

If stealth is any definitive parameter, organize the video by concentrating scenarios where stealth is key and what which side will do in this specific scenario, don't screw around all over the place.

BBBrasil
Автор

Just look at the sky over this two pictures...the picture on the left shows the totally polluted air of China...on the right picture the clean air of a metropolitan area in Taiwan. You have to be crazy to want Chinese conditions in Taiwan.

zenon
Автор

Why is this video so focused on the F-22. They completely ignore the extremely capable F-35.

jerkyz
Автор

These types of videos always leave out the difference in the training / experience of the U.S. personnel. Even if the others could compare in equipment, they lack a great deal in experience. And the mindset of our warriors is way different.

dallasarnold
Автор

The point of "stealth" entirely misunderstood is it doesn't make aircraft invisible, rather it makes them more difficult to detect. At a certain distance, even an older generation radar can tell you there's a stealth aircraft about leading into a directional fix. The key is how close the radar has to be to the aircraft to detect it.for example, if radar A can detect and fix a F-35 but at a distance of within 1km, the AGM-88 will arrive well before the aircraft can be detected. Likewise if Indian AF SU-27s are detecting and tracking J-20s from over 100km out, other than pretending to be a 5th Gen aircraft, the PLAAF would be better served dropping it alltogether.

markmatsushima