Big Bang Cosmic Microwave Background Theory is False

A new paper shows that the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy matches the distribution of local large galaxies. This is a strong indication that the CMB is local and not related to a Big Bang. For this and other reasons I discuss the Big Bang model for the CMB is false.
Cosmic Microwave Background anomalies explained: a strong impact of nearby galaxies on observed CMB large scale fluctuations

The Zero-Point Universe

The 100 Greatest Lies in Physics

Goodbye Quarks: The Onium Theory

God Hates Science

[lowlypawn]

Sounds much better, almost no clicks or pops, and nothing was distracting. I was just listening enjoying the content. Keep up the good work.

[unknown-zydp]

Your a saint so sick of this arrogant mainstream monopoly on science

[oswaldcobblebot]

Please explain, why the most straightforward interpretation of the observations is "crackpot"?

[StephenGoodfellow]

Nice presentation!
Decoupling Background radiation from cosmic redshift;
It really boils down to a basic Occam's razor question: Where is the 'Dark Ages'? This was supposed to be the condition of the Universe right after a theorized Big Bang beginning, but instead of a Dark Ages, the James Webb Space Telescope sees this volume smack full of garden variety spiral galaxies.
The Dark Ages is a logical extension of interpreting cosmic redshift as an evolutionary tool, but it was wrong, because we now know there is no Dark Ages. Since the Dark Ages does not exist, then the cosmic redshift interpretation is wrong.
If cosmic redshift is not an evolutionary measuring tool, one might ask the next obvious question: Where is the evidence for a Big Bang?
Astronomers and cosmologists still haven't realized their circular reasoning as they repeatedly keep referring to the pre James Webb Space Telescope images redshift arguments.

[ColoradoAdventures_Seth]

Did you mention the paper you are referring to about the problem with the big bang? Thanks.

[rayfleming]

Thanks for the donations that I used to buy the new microphone. Let me know how it is. Sadly having motorcycles with no muffler pass by every 30 to 60 seconds even at 4AM makes things difficult. If you would like to support my research you can also donate at paypal.me/rayflemingphysics or patreon.com/rayfleming

[AlaskanInsights]

It's kind of like looking out your living room window at night and
if it's infinite you are the center.

[SamMackrill]

They are just extracting imaginary patterns out of noise.

[a.s.vanhoose]

The arrogance of the bangers is a sight to behold. Are we scientists or believers in a big-bang religion?

[rayfleming]

I meant to thank Eric Lerner for sending the link. He plans to do a video on the paper too, and will almost certainly go into more detail.

[osvaldoperez]

I have a personal question about this topic, but I don't have the time to do the research for myself. Being a telecommunication professional, it is strange to me why nobody applied Shannon noise principles to space. You present a black body model, that s ok, but it is not possible that CMB could be related just to the minimum noise level in space. The mean level of activity in vacuum. Are we sure that vacuum has zero energy level? The level is too low that make me remember Shannon 's studies about telecommunications mediums and the always present noise, depending on ambient temperature level. I liked to see some research in that direction.
Nice presentation with physics principles and without the usual nonsense Thanks

[Jollyprez]

Robitaille gives a comprehensive review of the "observations" of the CMB and thoroughly destroys ALL of them. The original "discovery" which won a Nobel prize was literally noise from our own planet. He also describes why the Planck mission's sensors are miscalibrated - and he goes into the resulting charts and shows why they botched the image processing completely. Robitaille is a world expert in image processing from his work with MRI imaging. Check it out.

[thehonkening]

You know why they called it the axis of evil

You know the reason

[bitskit]

I would assume that if you have a whole bunch of dust and particles floating around that most of space is effectively a very low pressure homogenous gas. The surfaces of the particles being struct by radiation from stars and cosmic rays will essentially act as black bodies in any region of space you choose.

[captainharris]

3:22 I think the idea is that spatially every point in the universe is said to be the center of expansion for the actual universe pressing outwards, not so much that the Earth is the center. But thanks for your clarification, mister Fleming. I think you're right on the quantum pressure field, but it sounds like you're vetting other people for their theories. Interesting.

[pedrosura]

How about being able to see the CMB through the plane of the Galaxy as if it wasnt there. Microwaves are affected by matter. The data reduction performed to eliminate the Galaxy is an excercise in credulity.
Thank you for pointing out the paper.

[TimothyDBoyle]

While I would agree that there are a lot of unanswered questions that need working on, I don't buy your argument that the CMB is a local phenomenon. You state that the assumption that the earth is at the "center" of the universe is problematic. In the sense of being at some sort of absolute center, well yes, of course. But by definition the earth is at the center of the observable universe -- from the perspective of the earth. That would be true for any other location for their observable universe, because the observable universe is limited by the furtherest distance light has had time to travel since light could freely travel. The standard definition of the CBM, as I understand it, is that they are the photons that were released from everywhere in the universe when the universe was about 380, 000 years old and the hot plasma that filled the universe had cooled the point where neutral atoms could first form. Prior to that, it was opaque and photons were simply constantly being absorbed and reradiated, but when electrons could first remain connected to atomic nuclei (almost entirely Hydrogen and Helium), then photons could travel more or less unimpeded. Photons that were first released from points in the universe closer to us than what we observe as the CMB have already gone past us, while those from slightly further away haven't quite reached us yet. You were saying that there isn't significant redshifting of the CMB, but I understand it as being redshifted from the approximately 3000 degrees K down to the observed 2.7 degrees, which is a huge redshift. The "black body" distribution is one I don't fully understand, but I gather that the original plasma itself is acting as a black body, which would explain the distribution of the CBM. Anyway, it is an interesting topic.

[Pigeon_Birb]

The entire CMB is redshifted, it's seen as radio waves, the lowest amount of energy that you can have on the electromagnetic spectrum. The original light emitted was comparable with stars, and they emit in the entire electromagnetic spectrum at once but varies in volume in specific parts. What we see today was part of the higher intensity photons emitted at the time that have redshifted into radio waves, they are no longer part of the visible spectrum or higher.

[frun]

Some VSL theory is needed to replace GR. One with a nonlinear dispersion 🌈

[Verschlungen]

Thank you so much. For years, I've been bothered by CMB theory, but could not quite articulate why it annoyed me so much. Now I realize it was the earth-centric aspect you mentioned that made me instinctively balk at it. (Nice aside about crackpot theories, too!) Love all your videos, but especially this one.