Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 vs Sony 18-105mm f4 | What is the BEST sub £500 APS-C Zoom Lens

Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 vs Sony 18-105mm f4 | What is the BEST sub £500 APS-C Zoom Lens
In this video we are putting head to head the:
Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C
Against the much loved
Sony E PZ 18-105 mm f/4.0 G | APS-C, Power Zoom Lens (SEL18105G)
Which one is the better option?
Which is the best ASP-C Zoom for under £500?
Does the Sigma Lens have any Chance against the Sony Lens?
Will the 18 to 105mm Sony be the better option?
What Lens is best in low light?
Well all this is answered in this video, we compare both the Sigma against the Sony lenses head to head in these test:
Image Quality, Bokeh, Focal reach, Weight, Price, Balance, Sharpness, Low light Performance, Stabilization, Minimum Focus Distance, Size, Build Quality, and many more test to find out what really is the best zoom lens for your Sony E mount camera.

Enjoy!!!

If you have any questions please comment below.
Feedback on all my videos is welcome (but please keep it polite), comment below.
If you enjoyed this video give it a like and Subscribe to the channel for more videos just like this!

The Camera Man

The Camera Man

Enjoy!
🎦 Equipment:
Camera: Sony a6400
Camera: Sony a6600
Camera: Sony A7C
Lens: Sony 18-105mm
Lens: Sigma 30mm
Lens: Sigma 56mm
Lens: Sigma 16mm
Lens: Sigma 18-50mm
Lens: Sony 70-350mm
Second Camera; Osmo Action
Second Camera: DJi Osmo Pocket
Drone: Dji MAVIC AIR 2
Microphone: Deity D4 Pro
Microphone: Rode NTG
Recorder: TASCAM D60 mk2
Monitor: FeelWorld 6 plus
Recorder: Olympus LS-P4
Gimbal; DJi Ronin SC
Z axis Stabiliser: Airduo
Tripod: Manfrotto
Filters: Various
Video Editor: Adobe Premiere Pro

If you like please subscribe to my channel:

-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
View more EPIC 4K Videos from The Camera Man
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

If you enjoyed this video and want to support me please leave a LIKE, write a comment on this video and Share it with your friends. Subscribe to The Camera Man on Youtube and click the and click the 🔔 icon for notifications to follow us on this journey!

#mavic #drone #dji #sony @thecamera-man

[TheCameraManReviews]

Thank you for watching the video, if you have questions or comment, please post below.
What lenses do you use? and what lens reviews would you like to see?
Whilst your here, have you seen my Photographing Deer video? Check it out here:

[Kornholeeoo]

I have both of these lenses. The Sigma is super lightweight and great when you don’t need longer zoom. Great photos and bokeh is nice. The Sony G lens is superb to even though it’s a tad heavier but has more reach when you need it. Both are sharp and will serve you well. Thanks for posting!

[mikepanton]

this is the only video i've found comparing these lenses...thanks! great job!

[mikecrophone]

simple and straight review without too much gimmicks. Explanations are well-structured and articulated. Thank you for this video, sir!

[scottwinton]

I have the sony 18-105, along with sony 70-350, I just ordered the sigma 18-50, it looks like it will be on my camera quite alot, thanks for making the video

[johndonaldson]

I just did a second photo shoot tonight with the a6600/Sigma 18-50 2.8. It was a low key shoot. I'm very pleased with the outcome. My Sigma 56mm was available but I felt no need to use it. The pictures were so sharp I didn't feel the need to sharpen them in post.

The Sigma 18-50 2.8 can't replace the Sigma trio but it comes close. For low light situations the trio is best. If anyone asks me what camera and lens to buy the 18-50 2.8 will be my recommendation in many cases.

By the way I recently sold my Sony 18-105. It is a great lens and I used it often. But it is a bit on the large size, a bit heavy too. I opted to Keep the Sony 18-135 which I feel is just as sharp as the 18-105 and the variable 3.5-5.6 isn't all that far off from the f/4. The 18-135 has a bit more range, is lighter, and is smaller.

There's nothing wrong with the 18-105. I don't shoot video which is where the 18-105 seems to be a better choice.

[bondgabebond]

Excellent video comparing two completely different zooms for aps-c. I got the Sigma for my son knowing it was sharp and faster than my 18-105. I think those who are interested in video work, the Sony will be fun, especially the zoom rocker switch. But if I want sharper images and closeup capability, there is no question, get the Sigma, but don't throw the Sony to the wind. You will find it useful in video work. I wish Sony would produce a better version of this lens; it is quite old.

[ivorwindybottom]

Thank you for this video this was the 2 lens I was looking at for my a6000 I only do photography not video.. Was leaning towards the sigma now I'm convinced after your video so thanks again

[TexpatOTG]

My version of the Sony doesn't have either of the 2 focus problems you mentioned. Of course, it's not the sharpest lens in the Sony line-up, but I like it for my video needs. I bought it a gift, it's own body. It lives there happily now. Cheers.

[chicken.productions]

You should also add the tamron 17-70 and 11-20 to this test. Nice review.

[tristanrujano]

I own both, I love the weight of the Sigma, close focal length, f2.8 and size (when storing in a small bag it's easier.) However for the times I need extra reach it is really nice to have. personally I think the Sony is the winner. constant f4, much more zoom and OSS, cheaper too.

[chryseass.]

I own both of these lenses and absolutely concur with your results and conclusions. The Sigma is just the easier lens to use and is just so cute to look at on my a6500- a perfect pairing. The 18-105 is definitely front heavy but the power zoom is a joy to use in video mode.

[infinitesimulationstv]

I think the sharpness of the 18-105mm is good enough for 4K video at f/5.6, but not as good for high resolution photography. Green screen works best at f/5.6 at the camera base ISO or second native ISO and the lights turned up higher, and Sony also has that 10-18mm OSS lens so you can get 15-152.5mm with those two lenses, which is important for green screen.

[FreeLensImage]

That bokeh at f4 and 105 and big versatility is the thing i decided to buy this lens when there was a good deal on used market. OFC sigma is also dreamy lens because of 2.8 🤪

[edc]

Thanks for the good video. I have the Sigma lens and use it on my A6600. I like its compactness, lightweight and sharpness.

[giansgomes]

Very nice comparison and video! Congrats!

[davidsuro]

Thorough and useful review that helped me decide for which lense to go. Thank you for such a professional video.

[Lion-gqdi]

Very nice informative video, keep up the good work 👏

[TheFandangovideoguy]

How much better is the 18-50mm f2.8 in low light compared to the Sony 18-105mm f4? Any direct comparisons IN LOW light as in indoors? a wedding reception? I have the Sony FX30 and the Sony 18-105mm f4 and is a great combo for VIDEO-as long as there is some decent lighting. I have the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and the Sigma 30mm f1.4 too for candlelight lit banquet Halls of course but if the Sigma f2.8 was REALLY amazing in low light i would consider it...but for most uses the Sony f4 is great. Not soft for 4k maybe for photos...but I do video ONLY. Any comparison in low light pls? Thanks

[sdwanz]

Thanks a lot, at first I was confused to choose between the sony lens or sigma, and now I will go for the sigma lens🤌🏼Thank you buddy for making this video, it helps a lot