Neil deGrasse Tyson Breaks Silence On James Webb Telescope's Shocking New Image!

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Neil Degrasse Tyson will always… break the silence. Always.

willbart
Автор

"The essential aspects of the big bang starting with a hot....are well established and not in question" - That's a joke, because the so called big bang is based on data - but the interpretation of that data - are assumptions about that data.

babajaiy
Автор

4:50
This is the second time in the clip when the narrator says: "it takes countless billions of years for a galaxy like Milky Way to form".
Seriously? The whole Universe is 14 billion years old.

sorinescu
Автор

But...but....there was a consensus. And we were told science by consensus shouldn't be questioned. Weird.

briankgarland
Автор

10^^2.685e6? Isn't there a point in science where you can say, "Absolutely no way this could of possibly ever happened"?

"Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth".

From Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The quote appears in "The Case Book of Sherlock Holmes".

evanmartin
Автор

Long ago the universe was smaller and more compact. That means the universe was more dense and gravity exerted by larger objects affected matter that was in a more compact region.
So more matter gets attracted and pulled inward. Wouldn’t that account, at least in part, for some older galaxies having material to grow large and large more quickly without the need for esoteric matter.
If the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light, then how big and how much more dense was the universe 13.8 billion years ago.

jefferywise
Автор

Or maybe the universe is simply just older than previously thought. You know, fit the theory to the evidence rather than the other way around.

DeejayP
Автор

2:52 "Perhaps Super-Assive Black Holes at the Galaxy centers are heating them"

Mortalitor
Автор

Just like he is wrong on UAP's/UFO's making fun of people, ridiculing them, a true professional!

pitchforksarecoming
Автор

They spend their lives being 95 percent wrong. A life of theories taught as fact.

jasb
Автор

"Trust the science". The Science: "We were wrong".

robvanderwell
Автор

Science is limited to information. The word theory is an explanation of based on that information. It should never be seen as fact, but only the best educated guess. It will always be fluid and changing.

comeasyouare
Автор

There is the empirical, then there is everything else.

kevingainey
Автор

I'm just a random dumbass, but I'd like to offer a simple analogy. As a child, when you had to take that 3 hour long road trip to go down the shore (or wherever), that 3 hours seemed to take forever. After all, at just 5 or 6 years old, 3 hours was a huge percentage of your lifetime. It was as if time moved at a different rate. Why shouldn't the universe be any different?

SG-qmto
Автор

Can you point me to the peer reviewed paper you got this info from?

colinchesbrough
Автор

This has been debunked. The age of these galaxies was estimated from how red they looked. On closer examination of the spectra it has become apparent that these galaxies are much closer to us.

rogerphelps
Автор

Our universe erupting into an already existing universe seems as likely as our universe erupting into nothing, but my brain isn't bound by pesky math equations and such.

earthoid
Автор

My guess is a 33, 000, 000, 000 year old universe. The galaxies are older because the universe is older.
Simple answer...let's see what the real experts find.

johnmoreno
Автор

What is he breaking silence about ? He’s not even part of the working team

unnamedchannel
Автор

If it´s 1 times 2 to the x billionth power odds that we exist, what are the odds that we ALL exist? Yes, everything arose from nothing (shunya). Read Khyentze Norbu´s book ¨White Sail¨, where he debunks the myth of Scientific Materialism. I like Penrose´s model of a cyclical universe....close to Hinduism and Buddhism.

babbarr
join shbcf.ru