Absolute Value of Complex Number

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is like finding the scalar component of a vector.

Is there a relationship between imaginary numbers and vectors?

salehalmutawaa
Автор

The definition of absolute value is the distance of something from the origin (0, 0), so he found the distance from -4, -3i to 0 by using the vector distance formula, and it equaled 5

Dextract
Автор

I every time get motivated to get better at math when I see you sir keep it up

SenthurCuber
Автор

I never learned to consider the absolute value to simply be the distance from the origin. Hadn't got into complex numbers by the time I graduated. But it makes a lot of sense.

tom_something
Автор

I’m now prepared for the Riemann zeta function!

InfiniteInquiry
Автор

Thats a nice question type i would love to try solve, the long way.

ryanmahadeo
Автор

My last two brain cells running on the 2 hours of sleep and 3 monster energy drinks 0.4 seconds before I’m handed a 6 hour test be like:

megamuslimchad
Автор

Lots of people are curious about the connection between complex numbers and vectors, so I thought I’d add this comment:

A possible construction of the complex numbers involves using a “modified” R2 vector space. The construction begins by defining our regular R2 vector space, with the familiar properties of vectors from R2, but with a special way to multiply two vectors in the vector space, given by:

[a, b] [c, d] = [ac - bd, ad + bc]

We can prove that this multiplication has the following properties:

The operation is closed,
The operation is associative
There is a multiplicative identity
There is a multiplicative inverse
The operation is commutative

(We can also show that this operation distributes over vector addition too)

Also notice that if we have the second component of these vectors as zero, we just obtain the standard “real” multiplication.

[a, 0] [c, 0] = [ac, 0]

Finally, notice that there is a special vector within this vector space:

[0, 1] [0, 1] = [-1, 0]

This should be ringing alarm bells, as this is essentially saying that there is a vector within our vector space, which when “squared” is -1.

We have just constructed an extension of the real numbers, with an element whose square is a negative number, I.e, we have constructed the complex numbers!

We define i to then be this vector, [0, 1], and we call this second component of vectors in our vector space the “imaginary” component, and the first component the “real” component.

Because this new set is commutative and associative, we can rid of this vector notation, and instead think about just adding real and imaginary components individually:

a + ib := [a, b] = a[1, 0] + b[0, 1]

Then, we have:

i^2 = i x i = [0, 1] [0, 1] = [-1, 0] = -1

reefu
Автор

Ohh true abs is just distance from origin

kousei-sama
Автор

actually it's equal but not in exact sense... what I mean is |-4-3i|=|4+3i| and both = 5

CrocTheOne
Автор

Does this method work for real numbers? take -4-3 absolute value. -4-3=7(absolute) Using the other technique -4 sq=16 -3 sq=9 answer would be 25.

jimjenke
Автор

Also, I just have a question, is there a pedagogical reason to call the modulus of a complex number the “absolute value”?

reefu
Автор

Imaginary number is like the fourth dimension?

xdragonk
Автор

I think students would not make this mistake nearly often if you, the teacher, did not refer to the bars as "absolute value." In the complex domain, I have never heard any other word for the bars other than "modulus." The modulus of a complex number can be defined as its distance from 0 on the Argand plane. This motivates the use of the distance formula and the student will avoid making the algebra mistake that you identify at the start. Now, after computing a few of these, you can give them a complex number with imaginary part = 0 and they can discover that the modulous of a such a real number is the same as that number's absolute value. But I would NEVER start this lesson on complex numbers by using the term "absolute value."

Steve
Автор

Shouldn't the square of negative 3i be negative 9? Since the square of 3 is 9 and the square of i is negative 1?

EshaanL--A--BIV
Автор

This is all very good but how does it improve my gameplay in PUBG?

jackhammer_au
Автор

Thats a nice question type i would love to try solve, the long way.

ryanmahadeo