Finite Fields & Return of The Parker Square - Numberphile

preview_player
Показать описание
Matt Parker introducing Finite Fields and re-visits the infamous Parker Square...
More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓

MATT PARKER STUFF

NUMBERPHILE

Videos by Brady Haran

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I don't mind Numberphile's filler episodes, but I love it when they seriously advance the main plot like this.

wilkmarton
Автор

When I saw that "Parker" was a property of something in an actual, published research paper I legitimately doubled over laughing. The parker square is officially a real mathematical term!! I never thought I'd see the day.

JulietKneeled
Автор

It's so rare, and incredibly delightful, to see a grown man beaming with joy at what is literally a consequence of being mocked in front of an audience of millions.

QuantumHistorian
Автор

In the Parker Square video, Matt said something like "In mathematics, fame is different. It's when someone looks you up once a century.". This must mean Matt is REALLY famous now.

SkywalterDBZ
Автор

8:33
Kid: “Mom can I have P vs NP“
Mom: “No, we have P vs NP at home“
P vs NP at home: Parker vs Non-Parker

saraqael.
Автор

Also:
"They're all non-Parker — because they work." *dies inside*

sakkikoyumikishi
Автор

Everybody seem excited that "parker" has been mentioned in real, published research paper - but I think most of you underestimate how exited the authors of the paper are, that their paper has been featured in real, published Numberphile video.

WMTeWu
Автор

Parker square video was one of the most fun video I've ever watched. I never thought how a simple mathematical puzzle can be so enchanting.

wecantry
Автор

Everytime he said "Non-Parker.. because.. it's working" you can see in his eyes, a part of him dies. :D

olifantoliver
Автор

I love how mathematicians use Parker as an adjective meaning "almost works"...

TECHN
Автор

I look forward to seeing Matt being awarded the Inverse Fields Medal

alancash
Автор

Finally someone explaining P vs. NP in a way everyone can easily understand.

HopUpOutDaBed
Автор

The 6x6 table says 3*2 = 1 mod 6, but I guess that is a parker-one.

feudiable
Автор

I love the fact that "Parker" defined as "not working" is an actual term in a math research. I just started laughing so much, this was awesome.

agar
Автор

For those who might've missed a pun at 8:38:
P v/s NP (Which in video is used as a short form for Parker v/s Non-Parker) is actually one of the seven millenium problems by the Clay University. Each problem worth a million dollars. That means if you solve it you'll get a million dollars.

YosmHere
Автор

For finite fields of prime power orders there was some confusion in this video. The integers mod 49 or 4 or 8 etc don't produce finite fields of those orders. It's just that there do exist other finite fields of those orders with different structure to them.
Eg. In Z mod 4 the multiples of 2 are 2x1 = 2, 2x2=0, 2x3=2 and 2x0=0 and so there is no inverse for 2.

karlwaugh
Автор

"Every real number has a buddy real number, where if they multiply together, you get 1."
1: "Am I a joke to you?"
0: "Yes."

illesizs
Автор

He gave it a go, he tried, and finally he's achieved infamy in actual mathematical research! Kudos to you Matt

MrQwefty
Автор

The fact that you still have the mug at 7:52 makes me super happy to follow math community

namduong
Автор

I'm feeling the need to hear the word "Parkericity"

"Hey how about the Parkericity of that field ?"

ugu