How Artificial Intelligence will Take Over

As AI technology continues to advance, ChatGPT is quickly becoming a popular tool in education and employment. While it has the potential to revolutionize the way we learn and work, it also raises ethical concerns such as plagiarism and job loss. However, when coupled with human creativity, AI can drive innovation and automation in various industries. Teachers are grappling with how to adapt to this new technology, while schools and universities are struggling to keep ChatGPT out of their curriculum. The future of the workforce is uncertain, but it's clear that the education system must evolve to prepare students for a world where automation and AI are increasingly prevalent.

-------------------
CREDITS:

Andrei Terbea - Lead Animator

Stefan Popa - Assistant Animator

-------------------
MUSIC:

Background track: "Delusional (Instrumental)" by Spring Gang
Outro song: Joakim Karud - "Loudness & Clarity"

Wilfur's poem sequence: Christoffer Moe Ditlevsen - With Tenacity
-------------------
#ChatGPT #AI #ArtificialIntelligence

[andrei]

Thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring the video, and thanks to y'all for sticking around for the comeback. Anyway, how've you been?

[SomeIndustries]

If I had a nickel for every animator that I used to watch a lot, suddenly going into hiatus, only then to re-emerge again to talk about AI, I’d have two nickels

[TreeckoBean]

its good to see you back! especially on a huge topic like this today, i feel it needs to be covered a lot more than it is currently

[ItsSpectix]

“We need to Rethink the school system from the ground up” that’s needed to happen for a very long time

[Crimson]

As a teen who was moved up to the highest coding classes I have at school, Chat GPT is AMAZING. It pointed out flaws in my code I wouldn't have noted otherwise and even called out code my school gave me to test and make stuff with as being wrong.

[DBD_Dan]

Damn, after a year he's finally back when the world needed him most

[capricorn]

My problem with AI tools is that people use them to do things that they actually hate doing, devaluing said things. Let's take art as an example. AI "artists" don't want to ever touch a pencil, but they want to call themselves artists. They mostly hate drawing/painting and simply don't want to put in the effort, but they crave recognition and attention. Same with writing. You don't have to look far, because Amazon is currently flooded by so-called "writers" generating stories for profit, without ever writing a coherent paragraph in their life.
At the same time, real people doing real art suffer, because this crap floods their markets. Soon enough (if nothing changes), no one will know if they're interacting with something made by a human or not.

[jamon]

I was in a conference where academics talked about this. Many agree. If you can ask a machine to do what you're asking your students to do, then you must change the assignments you give them. Someone mentioned that Descartes was aware of problems of this sort, and that's why he didn't ask his students questions or to summarize texts, but rather to translate them, which is a task that requires a lot more understanding of the text and the terms it uses.

[vitaleriof]

2023 is starting to be the year of animation channels coming back after a very concerning amount of time and i'm all for it

[Stick-Toons-]

Bro left for 11 months and came back as if nothing happened. (other than he has hair now)
What a legend.
Edit: I didn't expect this many likes, thank you :)
Edit 2: Wow, just wow...

[orcaolivegames]

I've used it, and I love it. I also hope that Chat does make school systems rethink how they teach, becuase I feel like it can definetly use some improvment

[splitsee]

I think your point about Schools was especially true, you can literally ask Chatgpt about subjects, and then edit it a bit to fix errors and make it more original, and then you instantly get an A, all you need to do is edit to where its not directly like a wikipedia article but still like it

[nyami]

I love all the points mentioned, some of which I use on my own. I've always said that AI can and can't replace a human at the same time due to its limitations, and good examples of this is with AI art and writing like what was pointed out. I strongly believe AI should be used as a reference to better learn and understand the structure you're learning since there're always holes in what is made as what's generated always lacks something that makes it feel natural.

AI should not be used to generate and claim as your own working, but rather used to learn and understand so you can create those products on your own as it offers so many more examples than can possibly be made.

[bodaciouschad]

Trying to keep ChatGPT out of the hands of students is a bandaid- the real issue is that education isn't currently designed to *teach you anything, * but rather to test whether or not you can retain and recycle the information that you've been given. Real people CAN become encylopedias to pass exams and write papers, but software is much better suited for that task. Education is what needs to change to focus on building an understanding of the material within each student, as *that* will ensure the student learns and retains the information they'lll need while inuring the educational system against algorythmic exploitation because robots do not *understand* what they are dealing with.

[bambinazo]

I think this will force a complete change in most educational systems

[Courtmasses]

I work in a chat environment online, and I have been using chat GPT all the time to rewrite stuff to sound nice or more professional.

[ResumedPausing]

The way I see it, the inherent process of training an AI (needing millions upon millions of samples) means that AI would be good in general tasks, but may end up lacking in specific niche, complicated, or nuance use cases. Building upon your point, AI can help provide a general framework when performing a specific task (like what you said, becoming like an assistant), but there still needs to be a person to make the final adjustments and corrections for the nuances of the work.

[creolesque]

Oh, my days, Andrei! So refreshing to see you back in action. 🎉😭

[OfficialSCPTV]

I disagree about the creative part. I think it's highly creative. I mean, listen to the poem you asked it to write. That was very creative. I am not only an animator and illustrator, I am also a fiction writer as well, and I tested it by asking it to write stories that were very mindblowing. And I also checked it for plagiarism, and none of it was on the internet. It has also come up with great ideas for many things, that blew me away. The thing is AMAZING! A lot smarter and creative that most humans I know.

[josh]

As someone who has always despised English classes, ChatGPT is a godsend.

Outside of that, for software engineers, ChatGPT is also very good at implementing and explaining algorithms in any programming language you ask it to do it in. It can't flawlessly code up an entire program (yet?) but it is absolutely a great tool to help you do so.