Why didn't angels receive redemption? - Prof. Walter Veith

preview_player
Показать описание
Should the fallen angels have also been covered by Jesus' blood?

SUBSCRIBE | LIKE | COMMENT | SHARE

#angels #fallenangel #walterveith #thewordinspired
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Walter Veith always has an answer that makes sense. Great teacher.

margiehankins-jerde
Автор

But even as a sinner, man was in a different position from that of Satan. Lucifer in heaven had sinned in the light of God's glory. To him as to no other created being was given a revelation of God's love. Understanding the character of God, knowing His goodness, Satan chose to follow his own selfish, independent will. This choice was final. There was no more that God could do to save him. But man was deceived; his mind was darkened by Satan's sophistry. The height and depth of the love of God he did not know. For him there was hope in a knowledge of God's love. By beholding His character he might be drawn back to God. DA 761.5

teiborp
Автор

EGW said God the Father had to speak to the angels and told them that the Son had to be obeyed as the Father himself - this must mean that they were confused about the real identity of the Son of God, that they did not understand He was also God, why is that?. We also know that the Son appeared to the angels as Michael, and perhaps the Angel of God.
There are things we don't about the Godhead but we do now that God the Father could not be be directly revealed to the angels, probably without immediately exterminating the created angels, so could it be that the Son was "begotten" with a lesser glory so He could interact with them? Could it be that the covering Cherub, Lucifer, wanted to replace Michael and deceived the angels?

GD-qnxo
Автор

The place is dark and lonely and horrible and grey and every stepping-stone at the parth is Laboured with Dead Souls wandering soul souls the place is called the wallowing damed

planetaustraliachannel
Автор

Since you are so close to the beginning.. I would like some clarity on the whole .."come let 'us' (God talking to His counterparts) make man ....etc. people have asked me and I'm just not clear on what to conclude..'Genesis' gene sis make a genetic sis-ter out of man?
Q.1. Does Professor Veith have a lecture on where the first book actually came from who wrote it down scripturally?
Q.2. Why is woman expressed like an after thought? 'They' see Adam needed a mate, help/companion [only sometime later] under goes a 'medical' procedure (DNA removed from a rib etc whatever). ( like there was some other plan to populating the earth?)
Q.3. Why does Genesis read so similar to todays transgender narrative. (Satan's version of genesis upside down in the end times?)
Q.4. There's also the two conflicting versions of God expressed in the singular and plural 'Elohim' accounts, which one is correct?
Q.5. Are we the recycled incarnation of a crowd that followed lucifer out of heaven or, some new genetic experiment on the side.
Q.6 Angles still in Heaven verses Fallen ones.. do they have nuts and bolts yes or no. if so, as all dudes in heaven.. WHY?🙏

AV
Автор

Hi, I would like to dub some of your videos into Spanish and upload them to my channel.
I would like to ask for your permission. I do not monetize my channel.

Elultimomensaje
join shbcf.ru