Supreme Court DECIDES TRUMP'S FATE in immunity case

Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Donald Trump immunity case to determine whether he can stand trial for eleciton interference in the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith. Harry previews what to expect.
–
TALKING FEDS PODCAST is a roundtable discussion that brings together prominent former government officials, journalists, and special guests for a dynamic and in-depth analysis of the most pressing questions in law and politics.

New episodes every week! Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Make sure to SUBSCRIBE!

FOLLOW US

CONTACT US

[Grateful_Dad_]

They've already done him a favor by delaying, exactly what Dozo wanted.

[oapster]

Either the laws apply to everyone or it's all bullsh*t

[alanbennett]

It's about time the Supreme Court pulled their heads out of their arse and bring down a NO IMMUNITY VERDICT

[lenom]

It boggles my mind that Thomas doesn't recuse from that case. It's so crooked.

[josephhudson]

That they even considered hearing this is an affront to democracy and should terrify this country.

[bryanspindle]

The SC never should have taken this case.

[ednalowery]

I *ALWAYS* listen to and watch Mr. Littman. Measured, thorough, brief, no-nonsense reporting on relevant matters.

[jamesmorton]

The court better get this RIGHT! Americans. Want Justice for all.❤❤

[fretish]

Spoiler alert: they’ve already made a horrible decision to take this on. Impeach Thomas. Alito, Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.

[George.Q.Citizen]

Should the President be allowed to commit any crime, ever? Why would that ever be Ok? The President is tasked with executing and upholding the rule of law. Giving that person the right to defy the law—any law—would be “breaking” the law in its most literal sense.

[mannyj]

No Supreme Court should ever be allowed to get away with giving a Criminal Former president Immunity. That would necessitate Impeachment and Prosecution of said Court!

[jonesingblues]

I just love Harry...he's so down to earth and explains things for the common lay person. Thank you Harry for your input and view!!!!

[uhadonejob]

Who prosecutes the supreme court when they commit treason?

[Reflectiveness]

Astounding how the Supreme Court is playing games with the very essence of by the people and for the people.

[sandymedeiros]

What do we do with a corrupt Supreme Court?

[mimsyborogove]

Why did the Supremes ever agree to hear this stupid argument?

[raffinataonline]

This SC deserves neither their robes nor their pay.

[danlight]

Outstanding work in this episode Harry. Eloquence born of the fruits of your clerkship at SCOTUS and years of experience as a professional. My thanks for your analysis regarding the gravity the immunity question holds for our democracy.

[thedudescar]

Your supreme court's ' justices' wouldn't get within a bulls roar of one of Australia's lower level magistrates Courts, they wouldn't even be allowed to be a courts clark.
The paucity of jurisprudence arguments they have offered is an insult to anyone with a fully functioning frontal cortex🤷

[trs]

Why did the SCOTUS take the case? The appeals court decision is air tight. There’s no grounds for appeal to the SCOTUS.