filmov
tv
New Car: Skoda Scala 2019 review
Показать описание
New Car: Skoda Scala 2019 review
The new car has similar mechanicals to the Golf and the Octavia, because all three models are based on the VW Group’s MQB architecture. However, there are some crucial differences between them.
The Scala uses the smaller version of this platform, called MQB A0, which is more often used for superminis and baby SUVs, such as the VW Polo and Audi A1, and the VW T-Cross and SEAT Arona.
One result of this is that Skoda’s new family hatchback uses a torsion-beam suspension set-up on the rear axle, which is a similar arrangement to lower-powered models in the Golf range.
That’s not automatically a problem, though, because in the form we’re testing here – the likely best-seller, with a 113bhp 1.0-litre petrol and a manual gearbox – the Scala’s direct rivals also use this cheaper suspension layout anyway. Plus the car makes excellent use of its engineering, because it’s very comfortable on the move.
The 1.0-litre engine (another proven MQB quantity) is excellent, too, providing plenty of performance in the middle of the rev range. And the six-speed manual gearbox is slick, satisfying, and easy to use.
So despite being based on a smaller version of the Golf’s platform, the Scala is just as good to drive. Perhaps even more impressively, Skoda’s offering is also more practical. Its 467-litre boot is much larger than the Golf’s 380-litre loadbay, and there’s more room in the rear seats.
It’s a marvel of packaging that a car of this size can be so practical; and while the Octavia is slightly more roomy still, the Scala offers the hatchback body shape that UK buyers prefer.
The Scala also scores well in terms of interior quality; the materials used are a little cheap-looking in some areas – perhaps in a few more places than in a Golf – but the cabin feel is on par with what you’ll find in a Ford Focus or Kia Ceed – and there are softer materials in key places to lift the sense of quality.
The new car has similar mechanicals to the Golf and the Octavia, because all three models are based on the VW Group’s MQB architecture. However, there are some crucial differences between them.
The Scala uses the smaller version of this platform, called MQB A0, which is more often used for superminis and baby SUVs, such as the VW Polo and Audi A1, and the VW T-Cross and SEAT Arona.
One result of this is that Skoda’s new family hatchback uses a torsion-beam suspension set-up on the rear axle, which is a similar arrangement to lower-powered models in the Golf range.
That’s not automatically a problem, though, because in the form we’re testing here – the likely best-seller, with a 113bhp 1.0-litre petrol and a manual gearbox – the Scala’s direct rivals also use this cheaper suspension layout anyway. Plus the car makes excellent use of its engineering, because it’s very comfortable on the move.
The 1.0-litre engine (another proven MQB quantity) is excellent, too, providing plenty of performance in the middle of the rev range. And the six-speed manual gearbox is slick, satisfying, and easy to use.
So despite being based on a smaller version of the Golf’s platform, the Scala is just as good to drive. Perhaps even more impressively, Skoda’s offering is also more practical. Its 467-litre boot is much larger than the Golf’s 380-litre loadbay, and there’s more room in the rear seats.
It’s a marvel of packaging that a car of this size can be so practical; and while the Octavia is slightly more roomy still, the Scala offers the hatchback body shape that UK buyers prefer.
The Scala also scores well in terms of interior quality; the materials used are a little cheap-looking in some areas – perhaps in a few more places than in a Golf – but the cabin feel is on par with what you’ll find in a Ford Focus or Kia Ceed – and there are softer materials in key places to lift the sense of quality.