Why does NATO want to engage more actively in this region? | DW News

preview_player
Показать описание
Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand are attending NATO's 75th anniversary summit in Washington. China's growing military strength and territorial ambitions, as well as its growing closeness to Russia, have prompted them to strengthen their ties with the alliance.

Chapters
00:00 NATO and its Asian partners moving closer
03:10 Mirna Galic, senior policy analyst for China and East Asia at the US Institute of Peace
10:32 Philip Shetler-Jones, Senior Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institue
14:42 Angela Stent, Senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and author

Follow DW on social media:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

NATO is defending itself 40, 000 miles away ...

rodrigoescalante
Автор

So lets push Russia and China closer together.

_Dk
Автор

American position: "What happens in Indo-Pacific effects American security". Also America: "NATO enlarment to Russian borders is no threat to Russia." Yeah, makes sence...

ИльяРезников-нз
Автор

Funny how some humans creates enemies out of fear of “you’re better than me so I hate you”

PositionM
Автор

here comes European dream of imperialism 2.0. invading Asia - again. why had not European not giving up imperialism after all these centuries????

vincewsc
Автор

We all saw what NATO did to the GMR in Libya. We in the southern hemisphere don't want those kind of neighbors

throughput
Автор

The moment anyone say 'rule based international order', you can switch off.

tonyatgoogle
Автор

Nato is imperial alliance's and i predict that they will lose both cold war as well as a hot war

crashingintorice
Автор

NATO wanted to change it name to WTO (world Treaty Organization)

畢仕達
Автор

Mess up own house(EU), don't try to fix it, but want to mess up other house(Asia)

happymelon
Автор

The big question is how NATO has behaved hypocritically.

kchong
Автор

Just remind that Germany and Japan were two major countries invaded other countries cause WWII and killed billion people. Would they want to provoke WWIII?

BslmUSA
Автор

NAATO....
North Atlantic and Asian Treaty Organization

There, I fixed it!

bolkysadventures
Автор

DW again asking pundits for "analysis". But "US Institute for Peace" really is a good one LOL

cristinaximera
Автор

If China is Russia’s enabler, then what does it make countries like India, Middle East, Latin America, even the Global South? Even US and EU still buys Russian fertilizer and gas, why not self critic about it?

mapletibits
Автор

NATO has no mandate in the Pacific it’s the same reason why Hawaii isn’t covered under the NATO charter.

dominicjohnson
Автор

Typical DW BS. China n Russia n the rest of the world cannot be friendly with each other's. What sort of rubbish 😂😂😂😂

GIZMO
Автор

That north Atlantic sure gets around. Mission creep.

patrickcowan
Автор

31 cowards are sending weapons simultaneously but Russia is still winning.
Blinken: China is making huge difference in battlefield 😂. Who is the real superpower now???😂

emranahmed
Автор

What kind of defensive alliance is this

Vanogar