AI Banned By Science Journals

Artificial intelligence is changing the landscape of many workplaces and science is not immune to this. The question of what role artificial intelligence can play in science is hotly debated. But the question about whether or not AI systems like chatGPT, which are large language models (LLMs), can be used for scientific writing seems to have been answered by leading journals like Nature and Science. In this video, I discuss this issue.

— References —

— Social —
You can hit me up on some of my socials or check out my research.

— Equipment —
If you are interested in some of the equipment that I use to make these videos you can find the information below.

0:00 - Intro
0:45 - The issue
1:52 - False information
3:34 - Plagiarism
4:40 - Authorship
5:47 - The Ban

#science #physics #nature

[digitalplayland]

We stubbornly call CGPT an AI. Brute computing force is not the same as intelligence. But CGPT can be an excellent research tool if connected to universal libraries like Google Scholar, for example.

[bittertruth]

I'm sorry to say but the fact is that the "simulation of wormhole in quantum computer is an absolute bullshit"

[AKrn]

If would be funny if AI put viruses in computer code.

[AG]

Basically AI is a piece of mind of a person