4. Logic Lecture: Predicate Logic: Formal Proofs of Validity: Universal Instantiation

preview_player
Показать описание


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Oh my stars!!!. Dr. Campbell. You have no idea how much your videos have helped me. I was feeling so hopeless. I have been going at this for weeks.

shannonwilmore
Автор

i have my final today and needed a little clarification, thank you for helping educate those of us who need it!

graceh
Автор

YOU DR JASON First video on Discrete Math that hits home. Nothing in the books or lecture teaches me how to properly do formal proofs. Will be watching all your DM videos, subbing and liking everything.

happybuttonquail
Автор

Thanks Dr. Campbell! I'll be studying your other videos as well. 

program
Автор

You're a life saver man :)  Saved me so much time of trying to grasp it myself through correspondence studying ;)

BarryMichaelDoyle
Автор

Dang and I just finished writing out all the Symbols from your logic videos! I should have waited for the PDF! Ha ha.


-Matt

TurboSol
Автор

@gramo83 LOL...that made my day...good luck on your test! glad to help. peace.

drjasonjcampbell
Автор

@GreenIce221 haha...Nah...but I lived in Brooklyn for 10 years as a kid. Still have a little Northeast accent I see. I never switched to the southern twang, though I've lived in the south for many many years. Good ear.

drjasonjcampbell
Автор

@jamesknight002 Thanks for watching, peace.

drjasonjcampbell
Автор

@SellsAlyssa ...at the time of this response, I'm at Nova Southeastern University in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. peace and thanks for watching.

drjasonjcampbell
Автор

Thank you for the upload! Look at ~5 years ago you. being bause and making learning free to all with the ability to learn. Dont be nervious you're doing great. (5 years late I know.)

inadaizz
Автор

I thought the individual constants were a to w and individual variables were between x and z - so it's confusing to have the instantiation of (x)Ax->Bx) to be Ay->By. From the little that I know on the subject, that makes me think that "y" is being used as an individual variable, not a constant???? Thanks for making these videos. I am doing Predicate Logic through a home study course and the material provided for explaining all of this is not NOTGOOD - so I appreciate your instruction!

Evaly
Автор

Hello. I wanted to touch base on Politics and Logic. My question to you is, is Democracy based on Fuzzy Logic or on Universal Logic? Or if it does not represent either one of them?

americaisacontinent.
Автор

@95TurboSol haha...yeah I had to type it up between eating a second turkey sandwich...

drjasonjcampbell
Автор

No problem. Also, can you explain how P and P (listed just below what should be P v ~P under tautologies) is a tautology?

AbstractAbsorption
Автор

So the whole point was just to remove the "for all" sign and use another variable in the proof. Thanks a bunch.

sirwheistein
Автор

On the second page of the pdf you linked in the description, under tautologies, should it not be:
P v ~P

as opposed to P v P (as it currently is)?

AbstractAbsorption
Автор

@Blodhosta Go this this video: past the code after youtube dot com /

and jump to 12:20 in the video. I address it directly. Let me know if it helped. Peace.

drjasonjcampbell
Автор

ummm uhhh ummm let me say uhhh I will just start with the last uhh i mean the first ummm well uhhh never mind

mrblueeyes