Comparing Canon RF Wide Angle Lenses on the R5ii: 14-34 F4 vs 15-35 F2.8 vs 16mm F2.8

Just a chill POV session around some old rusty machinery to test out the Canon RF14-35 F4 and compare it to the RF15-35 F2.8 and RF 16mm F2.8 which I already own.

All images shown are straight out of camera jpegs taken the same day that this video was posted.

Day 26 of the 30-day challenge. Video myself taking photos every day and upload the video and photos the same day!

These are the camera straps we make (use code JUSTIN)
This is the one I use

[ApertureOV]

love it, im trying to decide between these right now

[brookscurran]

I have both the 14-35 and the 16. The 14-35 just feels pretty mediocre after coming from Nikon and the 14-24 2.8, the 16 is super cool but I’m almost always shooting them at fully zoomed out and would love a little wider. I just switch to the better 24-70 for anything not super wide angle. Would love if they made a proper 12-24 2.8 something similar, I might just get rid of the 14-35 for now.

[michaelcoussement]

Very interesting comparison! I have been looking into all three in the past as well, for more artsy portraits (full body, play with perspective, elongating limbs, etc.) but in the end, the 24-105 F4L still is more useful/flexible for me (I was considering trading it in for the 14-35 F4L). For now, I'll stick with the 24-105 F4L, the 50 F1.2L and the 135 F1.8L for my people photography (black and white model shoots, mostly in studio and indoors).