Supreme Court Justice Alito uses eggs and ham as example to question ghost guns

The US Supreme Court hears oral arguments to determine whether a rule issued by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for the regulation of ghost guns are consistent with federal firearms laws.

#ghostguns #supremecourt #scotus

The New York Post is your source for breaking news, news about New York, sports, business, entertainment, opinion, real estate, culture, fashion, and more.

Follow The New York Post on:

[armedinbama]

When will we start enforcing the constitution?

[DonKeecock]

She's wrong. I use receivers as paper-weights and door stops.

[nschlaak]

Stop planting trees because tree seeds are now recognized as club kits.

[Cicero]

Imagine the ATF prosecuting and imprisoning someone for a part that doesn't make a firearm a machine gun... oh wait, sorry Matt.

[WASHBURN]

None of this should even be the argument. Manufacturing your own guns is legal. So building your own guns is legal. We already know they can be converted, that's the point

[marksample]

Anything can be used as a weapon.
The omelette pan could be lethal.

[Le_Dislike_Button]

The four boxes of freedom are:
>The soap box
>The ballot box
>The jury box
>The cartridge box

NEVER LET THEM TAKE THE GUNS!!!

[FocusedHands]

a dissembled gun is not a weapon... it is gun parts lol.

[cesarcesar]

Every single point she is arguing is boiled down to civilian disarmament. She should just argue that.

[Ang.]

She’s trying to criminalize parts 🤦‍♀️

[bradywebb]

We have the legal right to build our own weapons...

[thomasjorge]

The Gov't is trying to say we may have gun-rights, but not gun-part rights?

[dgilroy]

Ban metal and plastic because you could make a gun. How far do we go.

[instandfilms]

None of this should matter. Shall not be infringed. People have been making their own weapons since the beginning of our Country and even before that. Text and history says they can't stop people from making their own weapons.

[TheMakersMarkTSF]

The words are really simple: ", SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"
There is no law made governing arms of any kind that is

[seanberthiaume]

"...shall not be infringed"!

[tmactable]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

[charlescarmichael]

This is all irrelevant. The ATF has no legal jurisdiction over weapons.

[RodneyBean-]

It says shall not be infringed so stop trying to infringe on the 2nd A.

[iceman]

Reverse the argument. Keep and bear arms applies to all arms and things readily converted to arms....shall not be infringed.