Response to @drpeterboghossian

[drpeterboghossian]

This is a terrific critique, Brett. I’m looking forward to hashing these issues out with you!

[thibaultdip]

The disdain you show when imitating a Bayesian around the 39-40 min mark is hilarious 😂 (and correct)

[rafaelvongehlen]

It's amazing how most people don't know something as profound as the Church-Turing-Deutsch principle and the concept of computational universality.

[rafaelvongehlen]

By the way, this was terrific! Great video!

[thanksfam]

You are my favourite communicator on the planet

[thecriticalrationalist]

Just a shout out to the value of this type of content - more please!

[stegemme]

your bias (sic) is falling away as you release each presentation

[mel_cosentino]

almost half way through, can't help say he's misunderstanding what Richard Dawkins is saying. He's not saying we can't, just that's not the environment we evolved in and therefore doesn't come natural to us.

[krathorlucca]

It’s a bit misleading to say ‘all explanations contain misconceptions and/or falsities’. I think it’s more accurate to say ‘even if an explanation contained nothing but the truth, we have no criteria by which to judge it is in fact the truth’.

[DigitalGnosis]

Hey Brett, are you familiar with Boghossians affiliation with the MCC, Victor Orban, Chris Rufo (receiving hundreds of thousands of $ in donations). Given the recent DOJ case against Tenet media I think this is incredibly problematic. Boghossian also blocks and bans those like myself who point out the way that these kinds of issues as well as biases like audience capture have led him to have epistemic blindspots on various issues. I have many, more detailed videos on this, including one where Peter invented allegations that I was stalking him in order to justify banning me so as to not have to engage with my views. Additionally, I am a postmodernist and Woke!