The Worst Prediction in History of Science? Scientists Are Baffled!

Two prominent theories in modern physics, general relativity and the standard model of particle physics, have conflicting predictions regarding the energy of empty space. The disparity between these predictions is enormous, differing by a factor of 100 googol quintillion. Despite efforts to bridge this gap, no solution has been found thus far.

Thank you for watching!
Subscribe to the channel, comment, like!

#scientifictheory #energydensity #cosmicpuzzle#scientist #VIS #VISSCIENCE

[FreemanPresson]

My money is on spacetime being quantized. Physicists are justly bothered by this, since both GR and QM are based on calculus that requires infinitesimals to work.

[madgepickles]

So this is the first time I've heard anyone describe dark energy as a repulsive gravity force and that was really illuminating. Thank you

[daveandrews]

All theoretical calculations are just a model of actual conditions. We are just trying to figure out which model fits the best to reality. There is an underlying problem with how physics explains time and space. I believe that time and space are the same. Einstein even called it space-time. I believe time is a quantum value also and that gravity is merely the effect of the difference between time velocity at one location and the time velocity at another location. This introduces a new term: time velocity. Time velocity is the rate at which time passes when the mass occupies space-time, it replaces time slowing the time velocity. The volume of time determines how fast time passes enormous mass replaces time reducing the velocity of time significantly. This is why time stops around black holes (event horizon) because space-time has been replaced with mass at singularity.

[tedwalford]

1. If particles are blinking into and out of existence throughout space, then space isn't at all "empty, " is it, by any definition.
2. Why do we think the universe itself is expanding? Do we see its borders? Large matter objects are seen to be all moving away from each other; that's fine. But couldn't it be that the agglomeration of all that we see is just expanding within a much-larger, fixed-size universe?
2b. In fact, might the accelerating spread of massive objects be from a gravitational attraction from a distant, dark, massive, spherical universal covering?

[victorsago]

Sounds a bit like the Ultraviolet Catastrophe of the late 19th century. 🤔

[NickMak-mc]

Could it be that physics gradually alter, or have some amount of alteration, maybe only slightly, over lengths of space? What if physics is only unified seemingly but it's really a gradient; the dynamism is so incalculably small that only doing things like... Looking at the time of the big bang would show us this affect?

[immane]

Unfortunately, today's science is primarily of a descriptive nature and has very little fundamental understanding. We have Newton's formulas that describe the movements of the heavenly bodies quite well, but here we are talking about force. Then came Einstein with his mathematical description and introduced the concept of curvature of space and time. Mathematics in both in some cases, they are descriptive and work well, but they did not hit the essence, because if they were, we would have manipulated physical phenomena. However, the potential of the general theory of relativity is far beyond what is used today. That is, with the help of this theory, it is possible to describe both dark matter and dark energy, even this the theory predicts, but science still does not recognize it. It's about understanding the concept and that's where the problem lies.

[Qarol-tk]

Incoherent magnetism in a spherical geometry would likely match the 4 hydrogen atom per cubic meter requirement . Why ? Incoherentt magnetism external mesured value is very low if we use 3 mm spherical magnet(full) bunched in a sphere . The better question is why the extreme ? Its closer to penultimate of 100% nothing . But if you put those spherical magnet in line ? They re closer to 100% something . Externally mesured . QUESTION, WHERE DID THAT MAGNETISM GO ? Not outside . Inside ? Maybe but i do not think so .

[MENSA.lady]

Pure guesswork. like most theories, time will prove it wrong.

No. I don't have the right answer.

[atticuswalker]

I have a solution that fits all observable fact.