Chris Rufo EXPOSES Critical Race Theory in School

Christopher Rufo has been at the forefront of a movement exposing how critical race theory has made its way into institutions across America.

He explains how it is affecting what children learn in schools, what parents can do to fight back, and why we're seeing critical race theory infiltrate corporate America.

[aramisy.cajigas]

A man and a woman standing up to expose lies and speaking up to tell the truth.

[rycen]

Teaching children to hate themselves because of the color of their skin, hate their classmates because of the color of their skin, hate their parents, hate their god and hate their country is child abuse. Start using the correct nomenclature.

[BrianDonato]

CTR is bad enough for white students but even worse for non-white students because it encourages victimization & low expectations. How any parent of a Black child can go along with this nonsense is beyond me. I'll also point out a very simple example of how CRT actually plays out in real life - Because I find often when people discuss it (on both sides), they never provide examples and simply talk “fluff”, or they discuss some minor part to CTR that is irrelevant to the part people like me find harmful.



To set the stage though - The main premise of CTR is that systemic racism is embedded in society AND any unequal distribution of anything by race is evidence of racism. So in order to fix this, the theory calls for drastic measures to change outcomes to create an equal distribution ... What this analysis fails to realize is that it's impossible to equalize everything because people are different. There can't be equal distribution in every field /area by race, gender, family background, personality, eye color, health problems, fair color, culture, income level, college experience, etc. because that is IMPOSSIBLE and CTR doesn't utilize much analysis past skin color anyway to consider any of these other factors. What you're taught in elementary school is that you can only compare #'s/outcomes when all the other variables are the same. CTR doesn't abide with this & neglects the fact that it is IMPOSSIBLE to keep variables the same from human to human precisely because people are different to their core.


The example is: School discipline often disproportionately affects young boys in school, let's say at one school the distribution is "Black boys are disciplined 3 times as much as White boys" - Therefore CTR would say that this is evidence of systemic racism since it should be equal. Oddly enough, by the same logic it would be systemically sexist against boys also if more boys are disciplined than girls - but of course no-one would publicly say this (This correlation proves the whole CTR is illogical to it's core too since logically they are the same ideas & both don't make sense). Of course it doesn't account for the actual unique situations or why there is misbehavior or anything like that, or perhaps the rate of discipline is actually just unequal amongst people with different home lives or 2 parent household vs. 1 parent households, and that accounts for all of the difference. But none of that matters - All that matters is skin color. So by CTR and the equity officer's agenda, they would need to create structures to get this closer to even - In other words, manipulate discipline and have lower expectations for Black students for behavior, let them get away with more because as noted - the distribution must be equal. THAT IS HOW IT ACTUALLY PLAYS OUT because there is no such structure/strategy to create equal distribution without utilizing unfairness. Therefore, in this school - Black boys are not disciplined as much as white boys for the same behavior. They are not taught how to behave. The teacher is softer on them, etc. etc. Which very literally compounds the negative behaviors of boys then .... So if you're a parent with a Black or mixed child at this school (like myself), you have the school very literally having the bigotry of lower expectations in terms of behavior for your child simply because of their skin color. So they have a "lower standard" of behavior for Black students. And the last thing any parent wants is for their misbehaving child to be "let off easy" by the teacher because then their misbehavior is condoned and they're not taught how to act, etc. .... This is EXACTLY how CTR plays out in reality. The whole theory takes group averages and then they actively manipulate the data on an individual level OR they make generalizations about the individual from group averages. It very literally is not just racist, but stupid.


This is just ONE EXAMPLE, but CTR affects everything because the basic premise that any lack of equity in anything is sign of systemic racism is illogical to it's core. IT MAKES NO SENSE through simple analysis. The same theory would say the prison system is sexist against men because of unequal distribution, or the NBA is systemically racist against Asians or White Players. It’s all BS. I could go on with several other examples but just wanted to mention one. I discuss it more on my channel though. I find very few advocates of CTR even listen to the criticism of it & are even OPEN to feedback on this. This allows this foolishness to keep on going & for the brainwashed that go along with it to not question it.



So unfortunate but I hope more people speak out against it because it is making things worse for everyone, no matter their skin color.

[kathleenkirchoff]

As a public school teacher who has been bullied about white privilege required professional development for a couple years, I am now seeing young students expressing much more racial hate in what was once a very welcoming multicultural school.

[jaylynbray]

Please keep educating us….I’m very worried about this 🤦🏼‍♀️

[kata]

This has been in our colleges in NY for years. Not a good thing. Most teachers in NY public colleges promote CRT ideology and college students don’t realize what their getting into until they are there and feel forced to agree with it.

[BrodyMcCain]

I watched a video today about some papers that were dropped off at some office in the 1950s or 1960s, these papers mysteriously turned up and they contained the real thoughts of the tabacco companies and its CEOs and leaders of tabacco companies. Those papers were then leaked to the public and it exposed what the tabacco companies really think, and were hiding from the public, that these tabacco companies they knew that it causes cancer. Until these papers were leaked these top CEO and leaders tried to cover it up. After they were exposed these tabacco companies promised to do research on the subject, but what they were really doing is more cover up.
Trying to create other reasons why people got lung cancer so they could get out from being busted and blame cancer on something else other than their product.

[debblouin]

It serves the interests of race hustlers and incentivizes school districts which have not been able to achieve solid repeatable results in essential subjects (mathematics, science, history, English writing and grammar) to transfer their self-assessments to social justice.

[kevinodom]

We can expect corporations to continue to move to countries like Mexico. Who can really blame them.

[jackievanburen]

The definition of theory in this case is guess not true theory, you know as in critical race hunch.

[janewx]

I’m confused...How is Capitalism not Exploitative? I like his definition of CRT. I guess if I were to ask him a question. I would ask does he feel that capitalism can be weaponized to disable the upward mobility to a specific group of people. Can it be weaponized to advance a group of people.

[zsomborv]

Courage.. well .. when one can lose their job, or their kids can be expelled, or they can even be charged as a criminal just because they spoke up against such madness? .. courage is just not enough.

There are sadly too few in "power" that goes publicly against the madness and could support those below them.. the majority of the "powerful" that speak up are those who created, support or even actively perpetuate the madness.

[jackkerning]

Tony Laskowicz is an American actor who was the first to have the answers

[calmnrelaxed]

Just watched him get handled by Marc Lamont Hill on this subject..sad

[alifqadrmuhammad]

Being critical of what is taught as Well as how it is taught may help in reaching a medium. Critiquing what is taught and how it is taught is a positive. Using the example of some Asian students is evidence of why those Asian students and their parents see nothing wrong with maintaining existing paradigms; they are benefiting fron it. Why would a beneficiary want to change the dynamic? Being critical and not dogmatic produces workable solutions. I think there is confusion between the two; critique and dogma.

[tracyrichard]

It's not guilt is called repentance isn't that what you're Bible tells you to do or is there really no repentance for Esau