pfSense: WireGuard VPN Returns As A Package

preview_player
Показать описание
Links mentioned in the video:
In Our Forums
Github Page
Netgate Announcement

Connecting With Us
---------------------------------------------------

Lawrence Systems Shirts and Swag
---------------------------------------------------

AFFILIATES & REFERRAL LINKS
---------------------------------------------------
Amazon Affiliate Store

UniFi Affiliate Link

All Of Our Affiliates that help us out and can get you discounts!

Gear we use on Kit

Use OfferCode LTSERVICES to get 5% off your order at

Digital Ocean Offer Code

HostiFi UniFi Cloud Hosting Service

Protect you privacy with a VPN from Private Internet Access

Patreon

#pfsense #Wireguard
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Links mentioned in the video:
In Our Forums
Github Page
Netgate Announcement

LAWRENCESYSTEMS
Автор

Tutorial Wish: step-by-step of setting up the Wireguard (Package) Tunnel on pfSense along with a step-by-step of configuring Wiregard on Android to utilize this Tunnel for Remote Access. The Netgate documentation is just working for me (never handshakes). Am also confused about the Public/Private/Pre-Share Keys.

kbdoa
Автор

I do like the idea of having this as a package vs integrated into pfsense. This gives us the freedom to add more features and enhancements. Looking forward to 2.6.0!

Darkk
Автор

I'm just learning pfsense.
I follow you with pleasure.
The homepage interface is very nice, how can we do it?

enesas
Автор

I just need more help with (allowed ips or destination ips) is it added on each side etc. Or allow 0.0.0.0/24

dannythomas
Автор

Looking forward to Wireguard. I just hope the add a setting to choos a WAN device for when you are using Multi-WAN.

TheDRMSKR
Автор

Oh look how did I know you would have a tutorial on this :) thanks.

DefconUnicorn
Автор

Hello lawrence did you already encounter a watchdog error in pfsense? this error show only for LAN

Did you have any advise how to fix that?

Thank you

vincenteinosas
Автор

I'll throw in a dumb question here: why would I want to assign the VPN interface group to a physical interface?

lindhe
Автор

Hi Lawrence, I was a little unclear what you said, can this package be sideloaded on 2.5.1?

zparihar
Автор

How would this work if I have wireguard on an unraid server through duckdns if i was to make/get a pf sense device? Would i have to move to the wireguard on the pf sense, or would I be able to stay on the one on unraid?

AceBoy
Автор

Hi Lawrence, wireguard is not already installed on pfsense, my version is 2.5.2, I wonder if it will be installed on it after 2.6.0.
I guess we can only install it as a package right now?

akoraycelik
Автор

Hi Lawrence, i am new to the system. Is it possible to use wire guard as client here and use a commercial VPN provider server like strong VPN or any other provider who supports wireguard

vinina
Автор

thanks for the demo and info, have a great day

chrisumali
Автор

Tom, when are you gonna create a how to video showing WireGuard connection to a VPN provider, with policy based routing... Love the new package, and I feel like I've almost got it implemented the same as your OpenVPN solution. But I just can't seem to get it to route... Thanks!

AllenSampsell
Автор

Hey Tom, is there any plan to do video on this?

nandurx
Автор

Performance are very deceiving compared to a test we did many months ago with a compiled version of wireguard on a site to site heavy load simulation. don't know what they did but at the moment look like an uncompleted work.

blender_wiki
Автор

If you have root access could you not just go back to settings hide secrets then remove the check save then all the keys show? It is a cool idea though.

thisoldhooptie
Автор

Tom, do you happen to know how this package performs? Is it slower than the previous implementation?
Thank you a lot for this video, I've been waiting for WG in pfSense :)

vonvision
Автор

I appreciate the video and your testing. As a user however I usually don't mind running beta software, but on routers this is really a no go. I really need the router to work being that I personally don't have a lot of spare devices. I guess I'll wait to 2.6.0.

kevinhilton
visit shbcf.ru