A circular hoop rolling without slipping on a half-cylinder - by Lagrangian mechanics

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, we analyze the motion of a circular hoop released from the top of a half-cylinder fixed to the ground and rolling without slipping on its surface by using the Lagrangian mechanics. We try to find the angle where the circular hoop leaves the cylindrical surface by solving the constrained Euler-Lagrange equations.

Please like and subscribe to the channel and press the bell icon to get new video updates.

Please watch the video with 1080p for better resolution and contrast.

You can freely use the animation inside the video illustrating the motion of the object.

Background music:
0:00-6:39 Waltz of the Flowers (by Tchaikovsky) by Tchaikovsky
Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported— CC BY 3.0

6:39 - 8:55 No.1 A Minor Waltz - Esther Abrami (from YouTube Audio Library)
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Why is there a negative sign in equation 4?

uniscience-marwanmasrat
Автор

you're goated wity the sauce my doggy

MahmoudHallak-cm
Автор

This is too good, helped me a lot, thank you, Your channel has needs a lot more subscribers!

akhilanr
Автор

This was very helpful, I've been stuck on this problem for days! However, I would have liked an explanation for why the second constraint is the way it is. Several classmates and I have been debating why alpha(theta + phi) = R*theta instead of just alpha*phi = R*theta. I'm thinking it's because the "rolling without slipping" condition tells us that, as the hoop rolls along the cylinder, it traces out arc length alpha*phi which is equal to R*theta. Additionally, then, the hoop moving down along the cylinder traces out arc length alpha*theta, and thus we get the constraint you had written. This is still counterintuitive to me, though, and just generally feels odd.

lazeau
Автор

I believe your constraint equation (ii) is off. (R+a)theta_dot is the speed of the center of mass of the hoop, whereas a*phi_dot is the speed of the edge of the hoop, which aren't necessarily equivalent. Instead, shouldn't you have R*theta = a*phi, which would be the arc lengths traced out by the motion? The time derivatives of the two angles would follow directly from that constraint as well

stephenrklein
Автор

How did you know that \lambda_1 is the normal force?

sayanjitb
Автор

I am not quite sure why you exchanged lambda1 and lambda2 at equations 5, 6 and 7. Lambda 2 has no dot derivatives

rabeyabosri
Автор

I don't know how you get that equation 4 🤣🤣🤣

rabeyabosri
Автор

Why is there a negative sign in equation 4?

davidandresrodriguez