Simple Linear Regression MLE are the same as LSE

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video I show that under the normality assumption for the model error, Simple Linear Regression Maximum Likelihood Estimators are the same as Least Squared Estimators
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Very very helpful.... Thanx.... I was just unable to catch up with the pace of professor in the linear models... Your playlist really helped me a lot ... Thanx again ❤️

shahbazahmad
Автор

thanks a lot, life saver before the stats exam

judhajeetchoudhuri
Автор

Thank you ma very much for this video. You made my day.

ezraezekielemmanuel
Автор

Thank you very much for this video. However, I think the Yi's are independent but not identically distributed since they have different expected values. Despite viewing the Xi's as constant, we change these values from one y value to another. What do you think about this?

elviswanasunia
Автор

Thank you very much for this video. I just had one doubt. Don't we take ln after L in MLE? Or is it not required here?

aditshrimal
Автор

Can you please explain why y will have normal distribution?

RaviShankar-jmqw
Автор

Hey, isn't it wrong to assume that x_i are non-random? What I understand is that they ARE random and we can only say that y_i is unconditionally normal if x_i and y_i are jointly normally distributed

Counter
Автор

Can you explain why did you say 'these are residuals' at 7:50, when they are epsilon/error?

where Yi = beta_0 + beta_1 * Xi + Error
and Y_hat = beta0_hat + beta1_hat * Xi

Just asking. Bit confused.

AbhinavSingh-oqdk