MORAL PHILOSOPHY - Metaethics 3: Non-Cognitivism

This video introduces and explains metaethical noncognitivism, and raises some possible problems for the view.

Study questions:
Comprehension:
What are the defining claims made by non-cognitivists?
What other claims do they tend to make?
Do non-cognitivists think there are any true moral propositions?
Do non-cognitivists think moral language is systematically wrong?

Extensions/Evaluation:
If moral attitudes are not beliefs, is it possible to have moral disagreements with other people?
How reliable is the connection between your moral views, and your actual behaviour? Might that count in favour of non-cognitivism? Or against it?
Do non-cognitivists have to deny that moral language is as it appears to be?
Is non-cognitivism attractive?