Resolving the Simple Query Issue in SQL

Discover the solutions to a common SQL issue involving string handling with the correct usage of variable declarations and joins.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Simple query that should be working is not

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving the Simple Query Issue in SQL: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

Are you struggling to get results from your SQL query when using a variable to filter with IN? You're not alone. Many developers encounter this issue when they declare a variable that stores multiple values as a single string.

In this guide, we will delve into a common problem related to SQL queries: why a simple query that should be working is returning no results when filtering using a variable.

The Problem

Consider the following code snippet where a variable is defined to hold a string of values:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Despite having verified that the variable @ manual is set up correctly using a PRINT statement, you find that the query returns no rows. Conversely, using the values directly within the IN clause works seamlessly:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

So, what's the issue here?

Understanding the Issue: String Handling in SQL

The root of the problem lies in how SQL Server interprets the string stored in the variable. When you use:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

SQL Server sees @ manual as a single string:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This means it treats the entire contents of @ manual as one value rather than a list of separate values. Consequently, it doesn't produce any results because there is no row in the table that matches that exact string.

The Solution: Utilizing Correct SQL Functions

To resolve the issue and perform the intended filtering, you can use one of the following methods:

1. Utilizing STRING_SPLIT Function

If you are using a compatibility level of 130 or above, you can split the string of values:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Using OPENJSON for Compatibility Below 130

If you're operating on a database with a compatibility level below 130, you can utilize the OPENJSON function combined with string manipulation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Improving Readability with Different String Declarations

Make the query cleaner using improved variable declarations:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

3. Alternative Methods: Table Variables and Common Table Expressions (CTEs)

If you want to avoid string manipulation hacks, consider using table variables or Common Table Expressions (CTEs).

Using a Table Variable:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Using a CTE:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

For scenarios requiring more values, you could use a table constructor to make your CTE more efficient:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

In summary, when using variables in SQL queries, especially for filtering with multiple values, it's crucial to manage them in a way that SQL can interpret them as intended. By employing functions like STRING_SPLIT or OPENJSON, or opting for table variables and CTEs, you can effectively work around this issue and fetch the desired results.

Don't let similar hiccups derail your workflow; understanding the nuances of string handling in SQL is key to your success as a developer.

If you have any more SQL queries or need assistance, feel free to reach out!