Healing the World: Can Multilateralism Survive in a Nation-First Era?

preview_player
Показать описание
Healing Geopolitics: Rethinking Multilateralism, Plurilateralism and Nationalism

In the third decade of the 21st century, we find ourselves at a pivotal geopolitical moment reminiscent of 1945, where the architecture of global governance stands at a crossroads. The original architects of multilateralism, who shaped the post-War order, have lost both momentum and interest in the multilateral project, underscoring the urgent need for a reformed global framework. The existing multilateral order also finds itself unable to respond effectively and decisively to dynamic threats like conflicts and climate change. These limitations have given rise to minilateral and plurilateral groups driven less by abstract ideals and more by interest-based alignments. Such a trend indicates the locus of power shifting away from collective supranational frameworks towards more localised governance models, thereby challenging the efficacy and relevance of existing multilateral institutions.

Can alignments based on specific interests and issues, rather than a more enduring worldview, serve as a sustainable foundation for global governance?
Is belief in sovereignty and the nation-state making a resurgence after decades during which supranational organisations and alliances fostered prosperity and security? If so, what are the underlying reasons for this shift?
Is there a way multilateral institutions can ensure their effectiveness and make a case for their continued relevance?

Moderator:
Samir Saran, President, Observer Research Foundation, India

Initiators:
Márton Ugrósdy, Deputy State Secretary, Hungary
Satu Limaye, Vice President, East-West Center; Director of East-West Center in Washington and Research, United States of America
Zsuzsa Anna Ferenczy, Assistant Professor, National Dong Hwa University, Taiwan
Nicolas Buchoud, Co-founder and President, Renaissance Urbaine, France
Nina Sajič, Professor, Institute of Political Science at the University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Discussants:
Velina Tchakarova, Geopolitical Strategist, FACE, Austria
Elie Pieprz, Director of International Relations, Israel Defense & Security Forum, Israel
Arta Moeini, Research Director, The Institute of Peace & Diplomacy, United States of America
Max Abrahms, Associate Professor of Political Science, Northeastern University, United States of America
Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti, Senior Research Fellow, Russia, Caucasus and Central Asia Center, Italian Institute for International Political Studies, Italy
Ramachandra Byrappa, Senior Research Fellow and Research Coordinator, Hungarian Institute of International Affairs, Hungary
Michael Reynolds, Associate Professor, Department of Near Eastern Studies, Princeton University, United States of America
Djurkovic Misa, Principal Research Fellow, Institute of European Studies, Serbia

#multilateralism #globalsouth #globalpolitics #globalorder #governance #international

Subscribe, follow, and engage with us:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Yes it will survive because India demands and commands it ❤❤❤❤ ❤❤. And why is that? Because this is India's century❤❤

surfaceoftheoesj
Автор

Respect to the Nigerian woman for standing the global South

driftking
Автор

Home and Jobe of maintain Basic to advancement toward's" is work of every one personality and corelated cooprative needs and fulfilments is chain work" became Industry before collective local needs to place of multy solutions became Market and maass level Needs and Solutions" naw what is Benifits to every one is caused of home expenses income came through working chain with are related every one needy to provider" and rest are disputs and Links smoother Transmissions of feeded energy withought loss or what presentage are ? Today is what ? And desrrt to green needs ?

NandKumar-qqxk
Автор

China too powerful to ignore especially when you are illegally occupying china land. yes, India top historian- India claims on McMahon line  and aksai Chin  has absolutely no basis. "India's Stand on China Border Irrational but Nehru's Handling Was Irresponsible" Avtar Singh Bhasin.
The wire. Karan Thapar

biggpicture