Branches of Philosophy - Ontology

This video lecture discusses very briefly the meaning, types, and characteristics of the term "ontology" as one of the branches of philosophy.


***

Feel free to share your thoughts in the “comments” section below, or hit the "Like" button if you find this material helpful!

Thanks! PHILO-notes

[yashsoni]

Whenever i cant sleep at night i watch these videos and just pass out.

[GbrElfunk]

Awesome, you don't know how I've struggled to find a video with such an academic rigour as this.

[dennismckee]

Of all the areas of study that helped me the most get out of a cult I grew up in was self study of ontology. It explained the most, and how this weaponized ontology was used.

[wmiu]

Thank you. This is very clear and helpful.

[Burqaa]

Continue, I'm learning now from Ethiopia
Good job

[mechannel]

Best explanation of oncology anywhere! Concise and right on point.

[susantompkins]

Thank you for this im getting a better understanding of it now

[yuda]

You are doing a great job with this chanel. Your explanations are clear, concise, thorough. I've found your videos to be the best source of Philosophical information on YT, especially the ones on Phenomenology ;)

[havenbastion]

Philosophy is of three kinds: Academic (history, jargon, people), Truth (epistemology, metaphysics), and Practical Wisdom (what most people call philosophy). Understanding it this way does better work.

Also, science is rigor. Logic is a sub-set of science that always replicates. Math is a sub-set of logic that deals exclusively with relationships of quantity.

[tommurgatroyd]

Nice presentation and great content, but would prefer to hear a more human touch on the audio front, sounds like text-to-speech

[tracitowse]

Great analysis, thank you! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?

[yurgh]

Thank you these videos are easy to understand and engaging (:

[havenbastion]

a) What is being? Differentiation in a mind from the sensory experience of an embodied perspective according to a specific intent to change things.

b) Why do things exist rather than not exist at all?

Why questions are either 'how?' - for science, or "from what intent/to what end", which requires a mind. There's no reason things exist except to beings for reasons. Otherwise it's undifferentiated stuff. There's no such thing as nothing except relevant to a specific use case; it always means the lack of something specific in a given use-case.

c) What is the meaning and nature of reality?

There is no meaning of reality in itself. All "what is the nature of?" questions are semantic - how do we want to/use the term?

d) What is the underlying principle of all that exists?

"Underlying principle" is meaningless in that context. Change is the universal substrate of material reality and all physical processes can be understood in relation to it. Things are a set of attributes and birthda boundary conditions in a mind.

e) Is there nothing?

No. There's no such thing as nothing in Actuality. The universe beyond us is undifferentiated stuff doing stuff, infinite in all directions, at all scales, forever.

[selinawang]

Thanks for the helpful video! I'm just wondering where does philosophy of mind belong to?

[asgharsufipakfaujkosalam]

Thankyou Philonotes and Sir who is presenting this video highly knowledge based video for the lovers of Philosiphy.
Sufi Muhammed Asghar M.A Philisophy Gujranwala Pakistan

[emZee]

If this channel has a good narrator, it would have a million subscribers

[priyadharshini-rpik]

Very nice explanation... Really appreciable 😊👍🏻

[asgharsufipakfaujkosalam]

Sufi Salam to Philonotes and his team.
Sufi Muhammed Asghar M.A Philisophy Gujranwala Pakistan

[EJM]

Could you provide references for your information, that would be extremely useful thank you. Excellent explanation nonetheless.

[tomrobingray]

You have defined "Ontology" as two opposed concepts: 1/ A Frame of Reference, and 2/ The Essence of Things. Does this not make "Ontology" a totally meaningless term.