Spacetime from Loop Quantum Gravity! | with Carlo Rovelli

Where are we going to find signs of quantized gravity? Which results are already providing us information about the fundamental nature of gravity? And what are those loops in Loop Quantum Gravity? We talked about it with prominent researcher Carlo Rovelli.

Carlo Rovelli is an Italian theoretical physicist and writer of scientific news articles and books such as the book “Seven Brief Lessons on Physics”. He is currently a professor at the Centre de Physique Théorique de Luminy of Aix-Marseille University in France. Furthermore, he is also a distinguished visiting research chair at the Perimeter Institute, and a member of the Rotman Institute of Philosophy of Western University. He is famous for his theory of quantum gravity known as loop quantum gravity that he introduced together with Lee Smolin and Abhay Ashtekar. He also works in the field of phenomenological quantum gravity and has worked in the history and philosophy of science.

[das_it_mane]

The way he described time was brilliant

[davidwilkie]

Yes, from the topical vibrational bubble-mode envelope POV, Susskind's ER =EPR shell-horizon envelope-shaping holography, of Euler's Unit Circle inside-outside holographic shell membranes, brane barriers to inclusion-exclusion orthogonal-normal reciprocation-recirculation frequency, prime-cofactor integration.

Hanging on to big bang discrete-ness is a dead end in the continuous Universe.

[winstongludovatz]

The interviewer knew when to remain silent thus proving her intelligence.

[Seekthetruth]

The host needs a better mic. Good video.

[HugoGuthrie]

Carlo, I know Physic, we could talk which would benefit you.see the physical world fixed by time, I see the interweaving clouds. We liive in all possible universe we are probable, that is certain.

[m]

Imagine modern Manna (incorruptible milk) .

Huh kyung young

[alexsuited]

So if your doing a quantum Gravity experiment, you must make sure there is no charge. If charge is present then it's EMFS theory. Period. I hate to disagree, but I must. The observational proof is absolutely 💯 percent everywhere for EMFS theory. You can't realistically counter the argument. The best that can be done is describing the actions of such. It's an opinion based in reality

[S-wq]

Linda, great job but please next time use a proper micro and take off the mouse from your mouth!
Just jocking.. almost 😅

[alexsuited]

Because it's not there. If it's not there from the beginning it's not there now. I would certainly have a much different philosophy than this gentlemen. To each they're own.