The Three Laws of Logic

preview_player
Показать описание
in this video, I will present what the three laws of logic are. First written down by Greek philosopher Aristotle, these laws have become part of philosophy ever since. It's important to familiarize yourself with them in this post-modern age. I also talk about how God fits into the picture.

Source:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The face she made when he laughed and said "What....can you?" And then he said "I'll give you ALL THREE" you KNOW she was like fuck, I didn't even know there's more than 1 😂

johnfayard
Автор

Paul, you have a marvelous speaking voice! Thank you for this.

Jobsgalore
Автор

W Video bro, helped a ton. Im out here tryna get into metaphysics before i even full understood this. God bless W

GalaxyRocher
Автор

Ah, this was what I was looking for: the 3 laws, simply explained. Good job!

wolfbenson
Автор

Doesn’t the holy trinity violate the laws of logic?

randellmathews
Автор

Is the trinity illogical by violating the law of identity?

twostep
Автор

Great vid. Simple and short but full of information meant to uplift and inform.
I hope all is well with you

ramtigerfalcon
Автор

Dude awesome vid. Simple, you jump right into it, no fat no nonsense then an out song and vid. Good job.

kalinbutler
Автор

Thank you! It was made very easy and simple by you!

sudomeister
Автор

There is formal system called type theory that regects the law of excluded middle,

hapehiftr
Автор

At 2:01, is Non-contradiction: "True or False"? Or is it "True or Not True"?

frmrchristian
Автор

Thank you so much! I appreciate this video a lot

Komorebiki
Автор

man thank you very much, this was awesome soothing and very educational.

janisbikernieks
Автор

i have a doubt
does law of excluded middle apply for the principle of identity and non contradiction?

thee_
Автор

I was watching videos about self referral problems. Bertrand Russell wrote Frege. Frege was going to publish a book about set theory and then he got a letter from Russell. The set of all sets that don't contain themselves is R. So does R contain itself ? If you put R into the set of R then it does contain itself and if you take it out then it doesn't contain itself but it should because R is the set of all sets that don't contain themselves.
Frege had a mental breakdown and landed in the hospital over it.
The solution is to put set 1 R1 is the set of all sets that don't contain themselves and don't include R1 in it . R2 is the set of all sets that don't contain themselves and include R2. Put these two set descriptions on two pieces of paper and isolate them in a box in outer space somewhere and inside the box have an electron emitter and a detector which detects spin up or spin down. If the electron is spin up then the first paper is burnt and if spin down the second paper is burnt . Now we never open this box, so inside the box is a superposition of the two states where R can be a member of itself and not be a member of itself at the same time. This solves Russell's paradox.

jeffbguarino
Автор

exactly what i was looking for. a concise explanation. i think i took intro to logic in college for an easy A

jamesquinn
Автор

What about the law of sufficient reason?

shrimp
Автор

The step that starts the process is the proof of whatever subject is being subjected to said laws.

Davidlee
Автор

Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Why did buddy throw god into the conversation at the end?

Byorin
Автор

You have my subscription good sir, thank you for this

Wolkebuch