Dynamic Request Model Generation in FastAPI Using Enums

Discover how to handle dynamic request parameters in FastAPI by using Enums with Pydantic models. Learn the best practices and potential limitations.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Is there a way to generate request models for the selected request params in FastAPI?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Dynamic Request Model Generation in FastAPI Using Enums

FastAPI is a powerful web framework for building APIs in Python, allowing developers to create high-performance applications with ease. However, when it comes to generating request models dynamically based on user input, things can get a bit tricky. This guide will explore a common scenario involving Enums and Pydantic models, illustrating how to approach the problem of dynamic request parameter generation and its limitations.

The Challenge

Imagine you have a FastAPI application where users need to select a type of data (like "text", "paragraph", or "images") from a predefined list. Each of these types corresponds to a specific Pydantic model that defines the structure of the request's body. Your objective is to provide the correct Pydantic model based on the user's selection.

Here's a simplified overview of what you might have:

An Enum class to store the possible field types:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Pydantic models for each type of data:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

A dictionary mapping the field type names to the corresponding Pydantic models:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The biggest question remains: How do you generate the appropriate Pydantic model based on the field name selected by the user?

Proposed Solution: Static Paths

While this is a common use case, it is essential to understand the limitations of FastAPI. The framework does not natively support dynamic Swagger model rendering based on user input. The entire Swagger interface is generated statically at runtime based on the defined paths and models.

Given these constraints, an effective workaround is to define separate API paths for each data type. Here's how you can do it:

Define Separate Endpoints

Instead of attempting to dynamically generate a model, you can create specific endpoints for each model. For instance:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You can do the same for the other types as well:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Clear Structure: Every type of request is handled in its endpoint, making the code easier to maintain.

Static Swagger Documentation: Each model is statically defined, so Swagger documentation will be clear and accurate for each path.

Limitations to Consider

Increased API Complexity: If you have a lot of types, it could lead to a more complex API structure.

Reduced Flexibility: Users must explicitly know the type of data they are sending, as opposed to dynamically generating the model based on input.

Conclusion

Navigating the intricacies of FastAPI and dynamic request models can be challenging. By segmenting the request handling into defined routes for each Pydantic model, you can sidestep the limitations of dynamic Swagger generation while maintaining a clean and manageable codebase.

Feel free to experiment with this approach in your FastAPI applications, and always keep exploring new ways to enhance your API design!