Zeiss Paved The Way, But Companies Didn't Learn (Planar vs Modern)

preview_player
Показать описание
Zeiss made the best lenses for many years, they got bored of it they were so good. Modern glass is not the same. They focus on obtaining the sharpest brick wall pictures corner to corner, because that's what you hobo photographers test in your review videos. Meanwhile, real glass has character. Let's do a Q&A comparing my new Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4 to some other legendary vintage lenses like my Canon EF 85mm f1.2 mark i, and flat garbage like the Nikkor Z 85mm f1.2 S and 85mm f1.8G lens.

If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll finally see the pop, of your bank account.
Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll finally see the pop, of your bank account.
Thank you for your Bitcoin donations :)

cameraconspiracies
Автор

This channel’s real purpose is to make us laugh and you do 😂 the crappier the gear the funnier to video

interestings
Автор

Enjoyed the very Canadian interactions of the surprise guests

bensinger
Автор

This channel will last 4ever, no perfect camera/lens will ever exist

emonty
Автор

That Canon lens definitely had the pop.

letni
Автор

No better way to start the week than with a video from this channel🙌🏽

chrisbrown
Автор

The 85G is so advanced, it put the cyclist in focus before he was even there

gamebuster
Автор

Zeiss ftw. Those vp shots at the end were flippin magic

mikeyhughessays
Автор

I had a Zeiss Planar 160mm f3.8 Seris 1a. The first Zeiss Planar ever made, it was made in 1895. That had so much character, much more than your modern Planars.

Nobody-Nowhere
Автор

So now that Kasey has opened my eyes to the fact that photographers are exactly like Agent Smith from "The Matrix", what do we do? They're everywhere and they look just like regular people, and these camera companies keep enabling them. He's alone in exposing this darkest of all conspiracies. He's Neo.

tech-utuber
Автор

You should definitely get these ones: Zeiss Classic 15mm f2.8/25mm f2/50mm f2/135mm f2

You will get the 3D pop + smooth, lovely highlights roll-off and better colors! 100% worth it 👌🏻

LucaBono.Studio
Автор

I have the 35 f2 distagon, 50 1.4 Planar, and the 85 1.4 Planar ZE. The 85 Planar is just the greatest lens ever!

captainkanji
Автор

Can have a really crap day casey always lifts me

mcmediaandfilm
Автор

im not carnivore and dont own any cameras - ive never bought one. i found you back in the day when you were vegan and watched you ever since 😂 i watch most of your vids on both channels. you're right i don't really care about the camera stuff. i just watch you because you are interesting, funny, relaxing. i wonder if im in the minority.

doomguy-pwmm
Автор

Love that this channel doubles as a scooter tour of Toronto

kathartog
Автор

This is my new favorite channel BTW. It's outstanding!

iamionscat
Автор

The Canon wins, hands down, on the main shot imo. But the pop jumps out of the Zeiss on one or two of your Vegetable Police shots there at the end.

KingfisherSeven
Автор

It’s still a dream of mine to move into Kasey’s junior one bedroom apartment, sleep in his desk chair and then when he wakes up I’ll also get up and then watch him live as he makes and edits videos👍🏽👍🏽

chrisbrown
Автор

I love Ziess glass. I know I’m partial but I choose Zeiss almost every time. I’ll go now.

WALKITOFFDavidSmith
Автор

I might be able to see what you call 3D-Pop. The Zeiss gives a slight 'halo' (extending about an inch including fall off) around your body whereas the Nikon 1.2 is absolutely clean (no halo) in transition between your body and the background. So, it looks more clinical. The 'halo' I see around your body with the Zeiss is especially noticeable when you move around a bit. Interesting. Edit - the Nikon G has some haloing but is harder to notice because it's lower contrast overall (not softer just lower contrast)

steveh