Economists Evaluate Trump's First Term | What's Next For The U.S. Economy

preview_player
Показать описание
As the Republican National Convention gets underway, we reviewed our interviews with top economists to see how they understand the economic impact of President Trump’s first term. Jeffery Sachs took a hard stance saying the Trump presidency is "the worst presidency in American history," aside from James Buchanan before the civil war. Paul Krugman expressed that President Trump’s ability to break Washington’s obsession with national debt was a positive contribution. Joseph Stiglitz hoped that other countries will not return the same “ugliness” as President Trump’s protectionism. Watch the video to find out how some experts evaluate President Trump's work so far.

About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.

Connect with CNBC News Online

#CNBC

What's Next For The U.S. Economy: Economist Evaluate The Impact Of Pres. Trump's First Term
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices."
_George Orwell

marcuscicero
Автор

That was my econ101 professor at Harvard.. Jeffery Sachs an amazing intelligence. This is a collection of the greatest economist alive, it’s a privilege to listen to an intelligent point of view

magnatenews
Автор

Well good to see the media being totally UNBIASED! Lol what a joke

nileist
Автор

Trump doesn’t even understand Econ 101 lol

grindingh
Автор

I love how this guy tries to place decades worth of governmental and economic failures on Trump.
...Like all of the points he made in the first minute and a half did not exist 4 years ago. Weak sauce.

RvrRaiderD
Автор

I'm no trump supporter, yet I can tell this news channel is only showing one side of the coin.

ELMACHODEMILO
Автор

Extremely unbiased video CNBC, keep them coming.

ShortRound_Games
Автор

I expected to learn something but it was just recycled info everyone’s been saying for years. Poorly done video

tylermartin
Автор

Man why did I expect an actual unbiased assessment. I'm not even a fan of Trump.

CarlosGarcia-twyw
Автор

Why can’t there just be a video that’s unbiased based on political party’s and just facts about the economy. And not just since Covid because no president could of handled this pandemic well maybe better but in no means a perfect way

austencave
Автор

This pandemic may have shown the American people that money can be printed when needed. Now, if they only would print less for arms, and more for people, the world would be a better place.

oldnepalihippie
Автор

They need psychiatrists to check his first term not economists.

Menroth.
Автор

What a poor excuse for a Commander in Chief.

n.e.g.u.s
Автор

I'm not an American, but the first commentator seems to have an agenda "Blame it on trump".
his bowel movements must also be caused by trump 😂

IT-jskq
Автор

These economists would be saying something different if this was Clinton.

joeywright
Автор

CNBC gathers the best economists in the world and everyone is like wE WaNt aN UnBaIsEd AsSesSmEnT. If an expert speaks, I would listen to them.

davyhiott
Автор

USA's debt to gdp ratio is 136%, the highest since WW2 and the federal reserve is massively printing money which will destroy the value of the currency. Germany post WW1 tried to print money to pay reparations but it destroyed the currency's value and generated massive hiperinflation, didn't help at paying the debt and made the problem 1000% worse. The solution is to cut spending

sylvio
Автор

"We don't care about the budget deficit anymore, so that's good"
.... what????

WTFMannyxFTW
Автор

October surprise: invasion of Venezuela

fps
Автор

I am a being who studied economics and politics at the University of Bern.
Two definitions.
Politics is the binding regulation of conflicts about values (Lehmbruch 1968).
"Politics is the sum of all the means that are necessary to come to power and stay in power and to make the most useful use of power." (Machiavelli, 1414).

Nonetheless, the question of motivation remains.
Why are you here and what drives you?

Thank you Mr. Stiglitz for your work and transparency regarding the empirical evidence of the absent trickle down effect. I keep making an existential claim to my non-substitutable natural property rights to water, earth, air and energy. After that, fair prices are required that internalize all external effects. I am ready.

bougaraboufola