The $2.3T Gap Between Trump’s and Harris’s Tax Plans | WSJ

preview_player
Показать описание
Former president Donald Trump’s and Vice President Kamala Harris’s tax policies are on completely different tracks. Trump has proposed about $6.5 trillion in tax cuts and would impose major tariffs on imported goods. Harris has proposed $4.2 trillion in cuts and would cut taxes for households under $400,000 and would raise taxes on corporations and the rich.

WSJ’s Richard Rubin breaks down the very different tax plans from the two candidates.

Chapters:
0:00 Tax policies
0:43 Trump tax cuts
3:13 Harris tax cuts
4:46 How these tax cuts would be paid for
7:08 Will the tax plans happen?

News Explainers
Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.

#Trump #Harris #WSJ
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I clicked on the video because I was hoping they'd talk about trains. Why can't we have nice trains in the US??

IbnTaymiyyah
Автор

I love how The Wall Street Journal keeps saying ``Cost the government trillions`` instead of saving the tax payer trillions

marc
Автор

25k for every first time home buyer? Get ready for every house to be 25k more expensive lol. Giving free money like this just becomes a negligible thing

matt_itm
Автор

i love how many people support tariffs while being clueless as to how it hurts them

CensoredMercy
Автор

Look, all I want is my Subway sandwich to not cost $14 instead of $5.

kevinduffy
Автор

The problem is that tax cuts without reduced spending just means the US goes further into debt. All this is doing is kicking the can down the road and putting the burden on future generations.

CrimsonGuard
Автор

We don't need to raise taxes, we need to reduce spending. Every small business in the world has to balance their budget but every government gets a money printer.

briceking
Автор

I can't imagine Americans without imported goods... Who's going to manufacture iPhones for cheap?

greendsnow
Автор

Focusing on the wrong end of the equation. Need to eliminate the bloated spending.

amoswhitwam
Автор

If you’re relying on Social Security to retire, you’re already screwed

Jericho
Автор

The fun thing about trying to pin the blame for high prices in imported goods, tech included, is that during the Reagan-Clinton years these same talking heads were singing the praises of deregulation and getting rid of all safeguards against monopolies. International trade was the answer, and untrammeled business entities scrambled to get all the work done in the U.S. moved off-shore where they could pay lower wages. It makes sense in business, but the government letting it happen without limit was criminally stupid. Now they scamper around trying to sell us that the stock market is not the bloated, cancerous mess that it is economically.

j.p.bumstead
Автор

When america raises tariffs, other countries raise tariffs in response, making everything more expensive for everyone

breadbaskets
Автор

Us citizens pay Tariffs. Not other countries. We will pay more

joelhaugen
Автор

Everyone loses at least somewhat with tariffs whereas the economy would surge if the bottom 80% had more money in their pockets

AJDelanoue-tbvo
Автор

I'm mostly a conservative but with ballooning US Federal debt large tax cuts as proposed by Trump will be a nightmare for the US economy. We cant just keep living off on loans

ladhkay
Автор

I am for taxing the s*** out of the Rich

diegop
Автор

Copy. They are both playing political theater and nothing will happen. Got it.

CM_Highlife
Автор

Price controls kills companies, and taxing unearned gains moves assets out of U.S. markets...both are unhelpful

independent
Автор

Wouldn't someone need $25K in tax liability to claim a $25K new home buyer tax credit? A new home buyer would need over 6 figure income to qualify for the full credit.

RAZ
Автор

Taxing unrealized gains is roughly the absolutely dumbest idea of all time, if the goal is to redistribute wealth to the middle class.

tschaderdstrom