BREAKING!!! Supreme Court 6-3 Decision Used To Strike Down Suppressor & NFA Tax Restriction Claims!

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video I break down the current efforts to remove NFA and ATF restrictions on suppressors.

🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥

📷 My YouTube Setup 📷

Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.

DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

1stPhorm: www.1stPhorm.com/armedscholar

ArmedScholar
Автор

The argument that silencers are not firearms dictates that the ATF has no authority to regulate it as it is not a firearm

bigfuzzy
Автор

So the ATF argues that suppressors really are NOT dangerous arms….yet fights to treat them as such? … while asserting that a RIGHT must be taxed … otherwise “purchasers won’t be paying tax” ?
The attorneys arguing this case should be disbarred given it is logically and constitutionally obtuse.

baomao
Автор

Thank you Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton, for suing the ATF.

allen_p
Автор

Murdock v Pennsylvania precedent states that a conversion of a right into a privilege and applying a tax or licensing requirement to it is not Constitutionally authorized.

VibeGuy
Автор

Love how the ATF claims that supressor & braces are "accessories" that have no 2A protections while trying to regulate them more strictly than firearms themselves.

sawyer
Автор

ALL the NFA TAXES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

KenWilson-jj
Автор

The ATF admitting that it's not about safety, it's just about getting money.

Jake-jdbd
Автор

Suppressors should have never even been an NFA item. Thanks for the updates on this unconstitutional law and what we’re doing to end it.

antny
Автор

It’s silly to pay an extra $200 and wait a year for hearing protection device.

walterhorn
Автор

Our Government is more concerned about denying our Constitutional Rights than defending them. When a government operates this way, we MUST replace the government. Defund 85% of the Executive Branch. Stop the madness.

sgt.grinch
Автор

The ATF’s own website lists the form 4 wait time is 200 days, so they already lied to the judge.

Jon__G
Автор

A suppressor is essentially a safety device. Why is the AFT against firearms safety devices?

davidowens
Автор

If they said, in court that it's only a 70 day process, they should be made to prove that. If I understand averages, and i do, then my 15 MONTH WAIT will really screw up their claim.

onesixv
Автор

Can someone explain to me when and how the ATF can tax people?
From my understanding, no taxation without representation. ATF doesn’t represent the people.

Drew
Автор

Taxing a firearm *OR* a firearm accessory *IS* an "infringement".
What part of *"shall not be infringed"* don't they understand?

supergeek
Автор

ATF and nfa need to be disbanded. They are out of control and we are saturated with LE organizations

jasongotthardt
Автор

Murdock v Pennsylvania has already ruled back in 1943 that you cant tax something protected in the Constitution. A tax is a regulation and to tax anything in the Constitution is to prevent its free and clear expression.

xDRAMx
Автор

If the ATF is arguing that the suppressor is not a firearm why are they even getting involved?

michaelsheehan
Автор

Why are we dealing with an unconstitutional organization

loadblock