Wormholes, Warp Drives & UAP Physics | Jack Sarfatti

preview_player
Показать описание
Dr. Jack Sarfatti discusses wormholes & quantum-entanglement, the physics of Susskind & Maldacena, extraterrestrial machine intelligence, Von Neumann Probes, and how modifying the space-time geodesic could explain the antigravity & warp-drive propulsion attributed to UAPs.

Dr. Jack Sarfatti is a theoretical physicist specializing in advanced propulsion research. He has a Ph.D. in physics from the University of California, taught physics at San Diego State University, worked with David Bohm at the University of London's Birkbeck College and with Abdus Salam at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics in Trieste, Italy.

Jack was the basis of the memorable time-travelling Dr. Emmett Brown in the Back to the Future trilogy, and the author of Super Cosmos (2005), Destiny Matrix (2002), Space: Time And Beyond II (2002), and the coauthor with Fred Alan Wolf and Bob Toben of Space-Time and Beyond: Toward an Explanation of the Unexplainable (1982).
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm a simple man. I see Sarfatti, I click.

Great work Tim! Keep it up!

Took me 8 years to get my BA in Political Science, but 6 months to get my BS in Cloud Computing so I can definitely relate to Lenny's story!

xKlondikex
Автор

Tim, remarkable interview yet again. I can’t tell you refreshing it is to see your confident yet relaxed interview style. Allowing Jack to formulate his ideas, freely communicate and instruct. This without constant interruption and the asinine self serving questions of a lessor host. You and Jack both really understand the axiom ‘It’s about flow, not about show’ Well done sir, I hope you do indeed take him up on his offer, love to hear his thoughts on consciousness as relates to UAP. Best Sarfatti interviews anywhere.

TulseLuper
Автор

Man, you guys are on a tear! 🎉❤. Ok, great… so he explains what needs to be worked out; K, Pi shift and so on… to make Warp Drives… but early on he says “the universe isn’t what we think it is…” and the conversation gets derailed with some doom talk before he settles into the techniques of UAP motion. Would love to hear him summarize why he says “the universe is not what we think”… perhaps that is part of the consciousness talk you guys discuss at the end.

Also, you started this talk by asking him to explain the relationship between quantum entanglement and black holes… would be great to let him take another stab at that as it’s not clearly explained.

You’ve had him on, what, 4-5 times now? I realize he’s 83, and you’re just trying to get everything you can out of him, on the record, for sake of expediency. It’s an amazing opportunity you have… and to share it with us is phenomenal! Thank you!

I hope his phone starts ringing soon. Sounds like he could help a lot.

jancarsonweatherby
Автор

Great presentation. I feel smarter, more connected, and curious as ever. Aloha

Mauirunner
Автор

Jack needs to go on TOE theory’s of everything.

adampomeroy
Автор

That was incredible! He's right on the money

gwills
Автор

I saw another saucer-type today about 4 km up, heading east over west London at 12:20; what you could actually see was just a white orb, but as many folks now recognise this is a bubble of warped spacetime around a small alien spacecraft, ie. your typical saucer-type.

What interests me here is these distinctive colours we see - what's fluorescing and why? The usual offering is plasma effects; for instance maybe the signature red glow from beneath these craft is characteristic of hydrogen emissions? But then would we invoke helium for the oft-seen orange glow, and so on through the spectrum? That's obvs stretching the premise.. So what about so-called 'cold plasma' effects, ie. selective heating of electrons over ions via high dv/dt EMF's - this tends to produce diffuse cold-white plasmas, but i'm not sure how it would explain the typical dull rust-red up through bright orange to brilliant white palette we're seeing in hundreds of YouTube captures. Perhaps we're not seeing photons released by _any_ kind of electron transition or classical charge acceleration per se - perhaps it's some kind of unfamiliar relativistic effect? Another component characteristic appears to be some degree of photo-multiplication - these warp fields often glow back in the same colour as any applied illumination; throw a green light on it and it'll glow green or whatevs. Yet as noted, it appears we're _not_ dealing with any typical stimulated emission mode here, so how might relativistic effects resolve all these observations?

Here's a saucer over the Medellin hotspot the other day: /watch?v=WmTd3FF4JoU - note the signature rust-red glow from beneath. Is this simply red-shifting background skylight? As we know from countless captures and testimonies, the red glow can also emanate from the top of the craft's central waveguide, and descend down to ensheathe the craft, which you can see here in this capture posted today, from back in June: /watch?v=wbTnMRZpaPA - you get a glimpse of a well-defined silhouette there for a few frames - but against a dark sky, mere red-shift obvs doesn't cut it as an explanation.. unless it's stretching wavelength but also boosting amplitude, perhaps? Or maybe some kind of adiabatic compression of vacuum potential is in effect, and we're essentially seeing dissipation of the virtual-photonsphere - basically energy from vacuum?

When they're glowing brilliant white, are the occupants having to squint out through that blinding haze (or use filters) - or else are they seeing the world outside _dimmed_ *and* slowed?

I've been categorising the many examples of apparent morphing as "mace-like", typically involving a dark central blob with morphing, geometric stellations - strange points and vertices jutting out and seeming to rotate around the craft - but the very first capture in the following compilation is a prime example: /watch?v=7NDGKSxFQTc - note how the warp lines seem suggestive of the arching waveguide internal structure as described by Lazar - presumably adaptive optics techniques could infer something of the internal structure of the waveguide from these optical distortions?

But the last craft i want to reference here in relation to these issues is one of my favourites: a capture at 60 FPS and 1080p, literally shot at point-blank range, with a zoom-in and slow-down on the warp field actually tunnelling though a series of CTC's / ER bridges right in front of our eyes: /watch?v=AE6vLJ2cxgs - using comma and period keys to frame-advance whilst paused we can see that it's translocating not by classical translation - hence no inertial, momentum or KE / dissipation anomalies implied in the first place, resolving most of the five observables as Jack notes here - but via a series of quantum-leaps or worm-hole jumps at a high but variable cycle frequency, only appearing as continuous motion when rising above the 60 Hz sample rate. We can also make out its shape - it's a disc of opacity with dual-curvature, like a Pringle, around a central box-shaped 'eye'; immediately suggestive of some kind of construct in a self-contained bubble of AdS space. Does this imply negative relative field properties?

Final thought - having been initially dismissive of Lazar's claims, his central physics-claim reduces to the assertion that the aliens have resolved the strong force with gravity; ie. that it too reduces to a curvature of spacetime. This 'gravity A' notion re-scales the whole ballgame, compared to the much-weaker 'gravity B' we usually consider. Riccardo Storti's presentation here with Tim a couple of weeks ago, along with the Lazar briefings he references, should be considered essential reading in relation to Jack's ideas here.. Loeb et al really are looking for super-advanced steam engines..

MrVibrating
Автор

Yes yes yes, Dr. Jack Sarfatti, yay!

megamillionfreak
Автор

@57:23-- you're talking about of, say; lidar or radar observations of tictacs that may be absorbed by a warp field ...or..?

carlton
Автор

Awesome ! Great interview ! For Jack yin is in town 😢

klingonbaronessprincesskar
Автор

Wish I could understand him. What a super intelligence fella

ianhearnden
Автор

Can you add time stamps to your videos?

ThatDudeTrent
Автор

So kind of Doc Sarfatti
to come back, ... and de-cloak long enough to explain anti-gravity, K, and his brilliant theories on "What is really the theory of relativity"

HisHigherness
Автор

To manufacture meta-materials, use gravity propulsion. Enjoying Tim Ventura. General Relativity in 1915-1916 has the exact solution to calculus at limit of math to zero temperatures. Up-falling mass describes the line to manifest a circle like EPR 1935 to power projection of thermodynamic electromagnetic path least resistance. General Relativity does not describe the line to pi emergence of spin to vector power of singularly of mass which is universal, orthogonalizing mass from zero temperatures.

channelwarhorse
Автор

Maybe the aliens who contacted him in 1953 are making it hard for him to be heard by the scientific community is because we would be playing with matches and they see we are regressing with our morals

stephanebourbonnais
Автор

Hey Jack, you should elaborate on this close encounter you had

cybercomputerized
Автор

@JackSarfatti are these propulsion systems compatible with our understandings of thermodynamics ? I remember Bob Lazar saying these engines violate the 2nd law of T.D.
I'd really love to hear more about *the universe isn’t what we think it is*, I guess you are not just refering to the ER=EPR conjecture

radiowallofsound
Автор

41:49 Cavendish found that "constant" (which may or may not be "constant").

PasajeroDelToro
Автор

Actually I'm still in recovery from his last lectures...
🤕 Oww, that hurt...👍

HisHigherness
Автор

Can anyone show me one of these earthling manufactured anti-gravity warp drive propulsion systems and let me hear the noise, sound, it emits. I am one of the very few people who has actually heard the sound a Real Live U.F.O. makes, would absolutely love to compare the two sounds.

joegarry
visit shbcf.ru